Coca-Cola handed mixed ruling in ‘Zero’ trademark row
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has ruled that Coca-Cola does not have exclusive rights to the term ‘Zero’, but has granted it a trademark covering a line of soft drinks.
The decision centres on Coca-Cola’s dispute with drinks maker Dr Pepper.
Coca-Cola first tried to register a trademark for ‘Zero’ in 2003 covering its zero-calorie drinks, including Coke Zero. In total, it applied for 17 trademarks including ‘Cherry Coke Zero’ and ‘Vanilla Coke Zero’.
In 2007, Dr Pepper, which makes Diet Rite Pure Zero, opposed the application. It claimed ‘Zero’ was a generic term and short for ‘Zero calories’.
But, in its May 23 decision, the TTAB said Coca-Cola’s use of the term had acquired distinctiveness in connection with soft drinks and could be registered as a trademark.
Despite this the TTAB left the door open for future registrations incorporating the term ‘Zero’ and said Dr Pepper could trademark ‘Diet Rite Pure Zero’.
Dr Pepper was told it could trademark the term because it is a full brand name, not just the term ‘Zero’.
Earlier this year, WIPR reported that the near ten-year dispute was set to conclude.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk