shutterstock_1010946472_nitpicker-2
27 February 2020TrademarksRory O'Neill

CJEU overturns EUIPO’s ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ refusal

The EU’s top court has told the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) that it cannot block the registration of a ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ trademark for being morally unacceptable.

The ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), issued today, February 27, follows the opinion of an advocate general (AG) last July, and means the EUIPO must now issue a new decision in line with the court’s judgment.

Eva Saarmann, of Hofstetter, Schurack & Partner, who represented Constantin Film Produktion, welcomed the CJEU’s ruling.

Saarmann told WIPR that the judgment “shows that the perception of the public is not determined in a purely abstract way, but by taking into account factual circumstances, in particular the social context of a sign”.

Constantin Film Produktion, which produced the 2013 German comedy film “Fack Ju Göhte”, applied to register the phrase as a European trademark in 2015.

The EUIPO denied the application, finding that it was in “bad taste” and “vulgar”. In an appeal to the EU General Court, Constantin argued that phrases such as 'fuck' and 'fuck you' could no longer be considered shocking in view of how language has evolved.

The EUIPO, on the other hand, considered this argument “inadmissible since it concerns a finding of fact”.

The General Court sided with the EUIPO, prompting an appeal to the CJEU.

In today’s judgment, the CJEU said that the film’s success in Germany (and that of its 2017 sequel) suggested that the title was not perceived by the German public as being morally unacceptable, noting that the films had been used by the Goethe Institute for educational purposes.

The court said “no concrete evidence” had been put forward to support the finding that the public would consider the phrase morally unacceptable when used as a trademark.

The CJEU annulled the EUIPO’s refusal of the mark, meaning it must now review the case in light of the court’s findings.

Saarmann added: “The judgment will have general significance beyond the individual case, especially for film companies and publishers, as it will give them greater legal certainty when applying for registration of work titles as trademarks.”

The EUIPO must also pay the costs incurred by Constantin during the legal proceedings.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.

Today's top stories:

Netflix seeks cancellation of ‘Choose Your Own Adventure’ TM

China hits back at US efforts to ‘block’ WIPO candidate

Is the US cannabis trademarks ban ‘untenable’?

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
3 July 2019   The European General Court erred in its determination that the trademark “Fack Ju Göhte” should not be registered by a film production company because it was too offensive, an advocate general of the Court of Justice of the European Union has said.
Copyright
3 April 2020   An EU advocate general has weighed in on whether YouTube should be forced to hand over details such as IP and email addresses to film companies.
Copyright
10 July 2020   EU law does not require authorities to order YouTube to hand over the email and IP addresses of copyright infringers, the EU’s top court has ruled.