• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Australia should adopt fair use exception, says Productivity Commission
rob-wilson-shutterstock-com-2
23 December 2016Copyright

Australia should adopt fair use exception, says Productivity Commission

Intellectual property rights across the spectrum need to be improved in Australia, according to a report issued by the Productivity Commission, which recommended the introduction of a fair use exception.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
AIPPI 2017: Panel hears about ‘fishy’ pay-for-delay cases
16 October 2017   "We didn’t do these cases because we’re against IP rights, but what we saw is, if you pay very substantial amounts of money to people in order for them not to go onto the market, it’s a bit fishy.”


Editor's picks

US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
In-House
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
16 January 2026

Editor's picks

In-House
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
16 January 2026
Patents
What IPR and PGR institutions mean under USPTO director Squires
12 January 2026
Copyright
Top Gun: Maverick suit nosedives on copyright and contract claims
5 January 2026
Patents
PTAB year in review: A shifting landscape and outlook for 2026
2 January 2026
Patents
UPC: A review of 2025 and what to expect in 2026
30 December 2025
In-House
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
24 December 2025

More articles

US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
Final call: Who are the world’s best in-house counsel?
Top Gun: Maverick suit nosedives on copyright and contract claims
Betty Boop and early Disney characters enter US public domain
Trademark and brands expert returns to Womble Bond after spell in-house
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 1
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin