• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Australia should adopt fair use exception, says Productivity Commission
rob-wilson-shutterstock-com-2
23 December 2016Copyright

Australia should adopt fair use exception, says Productivity Commission

Intellectual property rights across the spectrum need to be improved in Australia, according to a report issued by the Productivity Commission, which recommended the introduction of a fair use exception.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
AIPPI 2017: Panel hears about ‘fishy’ pay-for-delay cases
16 October 2017   "We didn’t do these cases because we’re against IP rights, but what we saw is, if you pay very substantial amounts of money to people in order for them not to go onto the market, it’s a bit fishy.”


Editor's picks

What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
19 December 2025

Editor's picks

AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
19 December 2025
Trademarks
X strikes back against Twitter.new
17 December 2025
Trade secrets
Aon sues new US rival for ‘poaching employees and taking boxloads of secrets’
17 December 2025
Trademarks
Rings of power: Oura counsel on protecting an $11bn brand
15 December 2025
Trademarks
Five firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s USA Trademarks Rankings
12 December 2025
Patents
5 ways director Squires is changing US innovation
10 December 2025

More articles

What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
The IP in Netflix’s $87bn takeover bid for Warner Bros
AI consultation: UK’s creative industry votes overwhelmingly for one option
EU’s top court says functional objects qualify for copyright protection
SCOTUS weighs Cox v Sony: A test of global ISP liability
On the table: Furniture case set to clarify copyright and design protection in Europe
FisherBroyles boosts litigation capabilities with veteran trial lawyer
The great AI ceasefire? WMG, Sony and UMG cut landmark deals

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin