• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Trade Secrets Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Australia should adopt fair use exception, says Productivity Commission
rob-wilson-shutterstock-com-2
23 December 2016Copyright

Australia should adopt fair use exception, says Productivity Commission

Intellectual property rights across the spectrum need to be improved in Australia, according to a report issued by the Productivity Commission, which recommended the introduction of a fair use exception.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
AIPPI 2017: Panel hears about ‘fishy’ pay-for-delay cases
16 October 2017   "We didn’t do these cases because we’re against IP rights, but what we saw is, if you pay very substantial amounts of money to people in order for them not to go onto the market, it’s a bit fishy.”


Editor's picks

Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
Trade secrets
Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
18 August 2025

Editor's picks

Trade secrets
Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
18 August 2025
Future of IP
Trump’s tariffs: Will your TMs survive the trade wars?
13 August 2025
Patents
Why Trump’s revenue-raising patent plan is rife with problems
12 August 2025
Patents
In focus: EPO's landmark G1/25 referral and what it could mean
5 August 2025
Trademarks
The $53m cutback to $1: Lessons from MGA Entertainment v OMG Girlz
4 August 2025
Trade secrets
Propel Fuels nets $883m in trade secrets dispute
1 August 2025

More articles

Artist challenges US Copyright Office decision over image that used AI
Anthropic avoids damages risk in deal with authors over AI training
‘This is not a rescue deal’: How an acquisition fits London firm's plan
China: Courts and AI face off
Painting the future: NFTs and the new canvas for African artists
Hollywood studio issues AI ‘hands off’ warning in film credits
AI law: Is the UK lagging behind other countries or playing the long game?
Blank cheque for Big Tech: Trump’s AI plan leaves creators in the cold

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin