08-04-2020
Radioshoot / shutterstock.com
Last week’s Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Stim and SAMI v Fleetmanager put the spotlight firmly back on one of the more puzzling, and seemingly ever-evolving, concepts in EU copyright law—what is, and isn’t, a communication to the public?
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
CJEU, EU, copyright, communication, public, radio, car, rental, hotel, dentist, YouTube, Reed Smith, Bird & Bird, Eleonora Rosati
CJEU lays down ground rules for ‘copyright trolls’
18-06-2021
Copyright-protected works can be used as evidence, says AG
03-09-2020
YouTube not liable for infringing videos, says CJEU adviser
16-07-2020
CJEU clarifies grounds of refusal in 3D TM suit
23-04-2020
Rental car radios not subject to music royalties, rules CJEU
02-04-2020
Sale of second-hand e-books infringes copyright, rules CJEU
19-12-2019
