8 April 2020CopyrightRory O'Neill

Analysis: untangling the EU’s ‘communication to the public’ rule

Last week’s Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Stim and SAMI v Fleetmanager put the spotlight firmly back on one of the more puzzling, and seemingly ever-evolving, concepts in EU copyright law—what is, and isn’t, a communication to the public?

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

CJEU lays down ground rules for ‘copyright trolls’

18 June 2021 Rights holders can request user information such as IP addresses to enforce their IP rights in certain circumstances, the EU’s top court has ruled.

3 September 2020 Litigants should not be liable for submitting copyright-protected material in evidence to a court, an adviser to the EU’s top court has said.

YouTube not liable for infringing videos, says CJEU adviser

16 July 2020 Platforms like YouTube and Cyando are not directly liable for infringing content uploaded by their users, an adviser to the EU’s top court has said.

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman

Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy

BREAKING: Key post-sale confusion ruling ‘welcomed’ by brand owners

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?

Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS

A missed opportunity? Supreme Court knocks back Aldi’s Thatchers appeal

Analysis: untangling the EU’s ‘communication to the public’ rule

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles