Adobe appeal sent back to district court in licensing row
Software company Adobe has suffered a setback in its bid to win costs and fees in an IP licensing dispute with Princeton Digital Image Corporation (PDIC).
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled yesterday, January 22, that it had no jurisdiction over the case as it had not been resolved in the district court.
PDIC licensed its patent for “modified statistical coding of digital signals” (US number (4,813,056) to Adobe in June 2011. The patent covers methods of encoding image data.
As part of the licensing agreement, PDIC undertook not to sue Adobe or its customers in relation to an Adobe-licensed product.
In December 2012, PDIC sued “numerous” customers of Adobe in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, claiming that the encoding of JPEG images on their websites infringed the ‘056 patent.
Adobe filed an intervening complaint in May 2015, arguing that PDIC had breached the licensing agreement by suing Adobe’s customers. By July, all of PDIC’s litigation against Adobe customers had been voluntarily dismissed.
Following PDIC’s dropping of its lawsuits, Adobe claimed that it was the “prevailing party” in the case and was entitled to costs. The district court ruled that it could not “determine at this time whether PDIC or Adobe is the prevailing party”.
The court awarded “defensive costs” to Adobe, ruling that it could only collect costs arising from its defence of its customers in PDIC’s infringement litigation, and not from the assertion of its contract rights.
Both parties appealed against the decision to the Federal Circuit. Adobe claimed that it was entitled to full costs and fees, while PDIC argued that the court had “erred in imposing monetary sanctions” on the company.
In its decision, the Federal Circuit ruled that it had no jurisdiction over the case as the ruling of the district court was not final. Before it could consider an appeal, the Federal Circuit said, the district court “must determine whether PDIC breached its licence agreement with Adobe” and, if so, determine the damages to be awarded.
Similarly, the Federal Circuit ruled that it could not rule on PDIC’s cross appeal until the district court had resolved the case.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Today's top stories:
Startup asks for relief from Hulu TM claims
SCOTUS ruling on confidential sales: lawyers comment
US Supreme Court says confidential sales can invoke on-sale bar
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk