Find an Article
Showing 3531 to 3540 of 3670 results
A common problem of opposition proceedings arises when the rights to a given phrase are acquired by the applicant based on an earlier registration.
On the final day of its 2009-2010 term, the US Supreme Court in Bilski v. Kappos finally issued its long-awaited decision on so-called business method patents.
On June 22, 2010, the newly created executive branch office of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC) released the first US Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement.
Almost 19 years ago, a new concept for providing a so-called ‘pipeline protection’ was incorporated in the new Law of Industrial Property, in force as of June 28, 1991.
On April 7, 2010, the Dutch Court of The Hague gave a provisional judgment in the patent case between Mundipharma and Sandoz.
The recent implementation of new measures in connection with intellectual property administrative procedures in Peru has brought excellent benefits for the trademark community.
On March 3, 2010, the Supreme Court promulgated its decision in Coffee Partners Inc. v. San Francisco Coffee & Roastery Inc. (San Francisco).
On 9 May 2010, a new Trademark Law will enter into force in Romania.
Levi Strauss & Co. has been protecting its intellectual property for more than 100 years. WIPR asked Tom Onda, chief IP counsel, about the challenges of defending such an iconic brand.
WIPR examines the truth - and the myths - about IP investigators.
Anand & Anand
HFG Law Firm & IP Practice China
Unitalen Attorneys at Law China
Kyosei International Patent Office Japan
Tsai, Lee & Chen Patent Attorneys and Attorneys at Law Taiwan, China
Inventa Portugal, EUIPO, EPO, ARIPO, OAPI, Angola, Mozambique, Nigeria, Cape Verde, São Tomé and Principe, Macau & East Timor
Johansson & Langlois Chile
The Luzzatto Group
Receive daily emails from WIPR