15 July 2015Copyright

New ‘Blurred Lines’ trial rejected but damages cut

A US judge has rejected calls for a re-trial in a copyright dispute that saw Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, the writers of hit song “Blurred Lines”, fined $7.3 million, but has cut the damages award that the pair was forced to pay.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

‘Blurred Lines’ writers refuse to give up in copyright case

25 August 2016 Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke, the writers of hit song “Blurred Lines”, have appealed against last year’s high profile ruling which found the pair liable for infringing the copyright to a Marvin Gaye song.

Marvin Gaye family awarded $7.3m in Blurred Lines copyright case

11 March 2015 A US court has ordered the writers of hit song Blurred Lines to pay late soul singer Marvin Gaye’s family more than $7 million after it a jury said the song infringed his copyright.

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’

‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion

Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?

Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS

Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal

How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

New ‘Blurred Lines’ trial rejected but damages cut

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles