• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • MoMA backs Warhol Foundation in Prince copyright dispute
shutterstock_89856988_northfoto
4 May 2021CopyrightMuireann Bolger

MoMA backs Warhol Foundation in Prince copyright dispute

The Andy Warhol Foundation (AWF) has garnered the support of prestigious art institutions and IP scholars in its bid to convince a US federal court to overturn a decision that the artist’s “Prince Series” infringed copyright.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Google v Oracle invalidates Prince judgment, says Warhol foundation
26 April 2021   The Andy Warhol Foundation wants a US federal court to revisit a decision finding that the late artist’s series of Prince images infringed a photographer’s copyright.
Copyright
Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers
3 July 2019   A ruling that a series of illustrations of late musician Prince by artist Andy Warhol are transformative and do not infringe a photographer’s copyright followed previous arguments made by the courts, said lawyers.


Editor's picks

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
AI
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
20 June 2025

Editor's picks

AI
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
20 June 2025
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
10 June 2025

More articles

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?
Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS
Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal
How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin