intapreview-1
American Spirit / Shutterstock.com
30 April 2015Trademarks

Five sessions to watch out for at INTA San Diego

What: Taking the ball and running with a pro bono case like the Redskins trademark cancellation action

When: Saturday May 2, 2.30pm–3.45pm

Where: CSA51

Who: Jennifer Sheehan Anderson moderator), Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn;
Wilson Brown, Drinker Biddle & Reath;
Megan Carpenter, Texas A&M University School of Law; and Robert Pimm, California Lawyers for the Arts

Level: Intermediate

More: When the panel discusses the Washington Redskins case, it will be nearly a year since the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board revoked six of the club’s registrations for being disparaging and offensive. With the dispute continuing, speakers will assess issues such as types of resources available at law schools that can be used in trademark pro bono cases, and how a law firm would decide whether to take it on, INTA says. says.

What: Industry breakout: Sports and entertainment—the intersection of the First Amendment, the Lanham Act and state rights of publicity

When: Tuesday May 5, 10.15am–11.30am

Where: IT01

Who: Claire Kimball (moderator), Turner Broadcasting System; Vineeta Gajwani, Electronic Arts; Robert Lee, Alston & Bird;
and Patrick Perkins, Warner Bros

Level: Intermediate

More: Comprising some well-known brand owners, this panel will assess the effects of recent rulings in the sports and entertainment industries, including whether they have had a “chilling effect” on creative expression.

According to INTA: “Speakers will discuss how First Amendment protections should be balanced against an individual’s right of publicity and trademark concerns.

They will examine which outcomes benefit consumers and whether those same outcomes benefit brand owners.”

What: Is fair use always fair? International approaches to fair use issues in a mobile world

When: Monday May 4, 3.30pm–4.45pm

Where: CM50

Who: Gavin Charlston (moderator), Google; Stephen Jadie Coates, Twitter; Sung-Nam Kim, Kim & Chang; Andrea Sander, Microsoft; and Cornelia Schmitt, Grünecker

Level: Intermediate

More: Three big technology hitters will be at this session, likely to be one of the most popular discussions on day three. The panel will focus on fair use principles from a global perspective, and global it should be—countries represented here include the US, South Korea and Germany.

What: Are “not so well-known” trademarks protectable in China?

When: Wednesday May 6, 11.45am–13.00pm

Where: CW20

Who: Shirley Kwok (moderator), Ribeiro Hui; Minnie Alexander, Campbell Soup Company; Karen Law, Alibaba Group; Emmanuelle Prono, Techtronic Industries, and Judge Wang Yanfang, SPC IP Tribunal

Level: Advanced

More:This session has a clear Chinese flavour, and is likely to be well attended given the strong trademark focus on the Eastern nation, not to mention INTA’s increasing internationalisation.

As INTA says, China has legislative protection for well-known trademarks, but “many foreign brands” that have a strong reputation in their home jurisdictions do not reach the high threshold of well-known in China.

What: Opening ceremony and keynote address

When: Sunday May 3, 4pm–5.15pm

Where: CSU50

Who: J. Scott Evans and Etienne Sanz de Acedo

Level: N/A

More: J. Scott Evans, INTA’s president for 2015 (see WIPR interview on page 40) joins chief executive Etienne Sanz de Acedo to share their vision for this year. Generally seen as the kick-start for the meeting (despite not taking place on the first day), the addresses will also discuss INTA’s impact on the IP industry.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
30 April 2015   INTA’s president for 2015, J. Scott Evans, has some clear aims for his tenure and some strong opinions on a range of trademark issues. WIPR found out more.