18 October 2017Trademarks

H&M and Wildfox in trademark clash over fictitious basketball team

Clothing outlet H&M has asked the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to rule that a range of clothing using the name of fictitious basketball team ‘Wildfox’ does not infringe a rival’s trademark.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

US govt to weigh in on H&M copyright dispute

13 October 2021 The US federal government will be allowed to present oral arguments in designer Unicolor’s suit against fashion retailer H&M, the US Supreme Court has determined.

H&M withdraws complaint against graffiti artist

19 March 2018 Retailer H&M has announced the withdrawal of its complaint against a graffiti artist out of respect for the “creativity and uniqueness of artists”.

H&M takes graffiti artist to court in copyright dispute

12 March 2018 Clothing retailer H&M has filed a complaint for declaratory judgment after being threatened with legal action over its use of graffiti art in a marketing campaign.

Netlist counsel: How we beat Samsung in computer chip clash, again

Under Armour continues winning streak with ‘Kings Armor’ victory

Cleary Gottlieb brings in five-partner team from Latham & Watkins

‘A craven attempt to sacrifice the rule of law’: Firms draw lines in face of Trump assault

Acting USPTO director enacts new PTAB policy with Motorola decision

Nokia and Amazon resolve global dispute over Prime Video and streaming devices

London firm adds two experienced partners

Biscoff maker's EU red and white colour mark crumbles

H&M and Wildfox in trademark clash over fictitious basketball team

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles