shutterstock_1098997382_jonathanweiss
13 April 2021Rory O'Neill

Walmart hit with $115m trade secrets bill

Walmart must pay agricultural technology company Ecoark $115 million after it was found to have misappropriated trade secrets.

Ecoark, which owns Zest Labs, sued Walmart in August 2018, claiming that the supermarket chain had wrongfully used and disclosed Zest trade secrets concerning technology for reducing food waste.

A jury at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas found on Friday that Walmart was liable for three claims, including trade secrets misappropriation and failure to comply with a written contract.

The jury awarded $65 million in compensatory damages, as well as $50 million in punitive damages for Walmart’s “willful and malicious” conduct.

“We are grateful that the jury understood and acknowledged the evidence that supported Zest’s claims,” said Zest CEO Peter Mehring, adding: “This outcome further validates the unique and valuable solutions that Zest Labs built, and underscores the strength of our IP.”

The suit concerned Walmart’s Eden, a technology system that tracks the freshness of food along the supply chain to Walmart’s retail stores. “We were surprised and concerned by how similar Walmart’s Eden description was to Zest Fresh,” said Mehring in 2018, after Ecoark filed the suit. Zest Fresh is the company’s flagship product, which monitors food supplies in real-time as they are transported.

Zest Labs said it had a multi-year business relationship with Walmart until 2017, through which the retail chain acquired information from Zest Fresh which it was bound by contract to keep confidential.

“We are happy that we had our day in court and that the jury found that Walmart misappropriated our trade secrets and breached the agreement between the parties. The damages awarded were strongly supported by the evidence,” said Ecoark CEO Randy May

May continued: “The jury verdict also allows us to file motions seeking attorneys’ fees and costs. We do not believe Walmart has any basis to appeal the verdict and doing so will only confirm that the judgment was proper.”

But the Arkansas Times reports that Walmart is already planning an appeal, quoting a spokesperson as saying: “Walmart values its business relationships and respects the IP rights of others. We have policies in place to prevent the inappropriate use of third-party assets. We believe the jury’s verdict is excessive, not supported by the facts and should be set aside. We plan to file post-trial motions and are considering our next steps.”

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Today’s top stories

UK registered designs hold strong

EPO BoA report shows successful 2020, despite COVID impact

Ericsson gains backing of Iancu, Tillis, Michel in FRAND dispute

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
13 December 2019   A US district court has ruled that a trademark owned by the organisers of the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally for the word ‘Sturgis’ is invalid.
Copyright
14 October 2019   A subsidiary of American conglomerate Broadcom has sued Canadian retailer Hudson’s Bay for copyright infringement, claiming the Saks Fifth Avenue owner breached a software licensing agreement.
Trademarks
26 January 2022   Walmart has asked a California court to deny shoemaker Vans’ request to block sales of the supermarket giant’s own-brand shoes that it claims infringes its designs.