Why a pair of fashion TM disputes could ‘hamper’ brand protection

The outcome of Coach v Gap and Penn State v Vintage Brand could have ‘serious ramifications’ for brand owners and licensing, depending on their outcome. Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme and Kate Garber of Pryor Cashman explain how.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com

More on this story

Trademarks

Levi Strauss needles UK fashion brand over tab and stitching TM

4 April 2024 The US brand accuses a UK online clothing firm of trademark infringement over pocket tabs and stitching designs | Suit claims similarities have caused consumer confusion, harmed reputation, and affected the distinctiveness of Levi Strauss’s marks.

Future of IP

Can a fashion designer use GenAI to continue their legacy?

28 March 2024 News that a renowned designer is training an AI to create in her style prompts serious questions over IP ownership, say Magdalena Borucka and Margarita Taliadoros of Taylor Wessing.

Second UPC injunction piles pressure on Disney

‘Engagement and collaboration’: New IP Federation president builds on strong foundations

AliExpress hit with €550m fine over failure to tackle illegal products

Attorneys’ fees slashed as judge signs off landmark $1.5bn Anthropic deal

Masimo keeps $634m smartwatch award and moves to appeal

No mention of IP as Narayan becomes UK’s first Cabinet-level AI Minister

What UK intellectual property wants from the new prime minister

EUIPO applauds Spain’s FIFA World Cup win—and looks ahead to 2030

Why a pair of fashion TM disputes could ‘hamper’ brand protection

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles