shutterstock_1416694388_dcstockphotography
1 July 2021PatentsRory O'Neill

USPTO warns patent applicants over predicted results

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has warned applicants to clearly distinguish between real and predicted results when drafting patents.

Predicted or “prophetic” results should be described using the present or future tense to avoid confusion, said USPTO Commissioner for Patents, Andrew Hershfield, in a US Federal Register notice today, July 1.

Applicants can use examples to demonstrate how a person of ordinary skill in the art could practise the claimed invention. They are allowed to use predicted results for this purpose, but must make it clear that these are not real results.

Failure to do so could endanger the success of a patent application, Hershfield warned, writing: “When prophetic examples are described in a manner that is ambiguous or that implies that the results are actual, the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure may come into question.”

“Care should be taken to see that inaccurate or misleading statements, inaccurate evidence, or inaccurate experiments are not introduced into the record,” he added.

Describing predicted or hypothetical results using the past tense, in a way that implies the experiments were actually performed, could be considered fraud, the Federal Register notice said.

“No results should be represented as actual results unless they have actually been achieved. Distinguishing prophetic examples from working examples in a clear manner will avoid raising issues relating to the applicant’s duty of disclosure,” it said.

The notice details “best practice” for applicants to follow to ensure prophetic results are clearly distinguished from actual results.

“It is a best practice to label examples as prophetic or otherwise separate them from working examples to avoid ambiguities. Such presentation will help a reader easily distinguish prophetic examples from working examples with actual experimental results and will enhance the public’s ability to rely on the patent disclosure.”

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Today’s top stories

Sky loses opposition in ‘Skyliners’ TM case

Adidas sues Thom Browne for ‘infringing’ stripe TM

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
12 May 2021   The US Patent and Trademark Office has issued US patent number 11 million to 4C Medical Technologies for its prosthetic heart valve invention.
Patents
25 February 2021   The US Patent and Trademark Office has urged a federal court to uphold its finding that patents cannot cover inventions by artificial intelligence, and dismiss a suit challenging its position.