Sisvel accuses Dell, TCL and Tesla of patent infringement
European IP licensor and patent pool operator Sisvel hit numerous companies including Dell, TCL and Tesla with patent infringement lawsuits late last week.
In a series of suits filed at the US District Court for the District of Delaware, Sisvel accused the companies of infringing patents related to 3G and 4G technology.
According to Sisvel’s suit, Tesla’s Model S, Model 3, and Model X infringe nine patents, each of which relate to technology for cellular communications networks.
The patents at issue in the Tesla suit were formerly owned by companies including Nokia, Blackberry and LG Electronics. And, according to Sisvel, the patents are essential to cellular standards including 3G and 4G.
Sisvel allegedly sent letters to Tesla, offering to license the patents but “despite Sisvel’s continuous efforts and numerous demonstrations of infringement over approximately two years, Tesla refused to take a licence to the offered patents”.
Meanwhile, in the Dell suit, the technology company is accused of infringing nine patents through the sale of its Latitude and Precision computer and laptop lines, and its mobile broadband wireless cellular modem.
Sisvel has allegedly spent nearly six years trying to get Dell to take a licence to the patents and demonstrating infringement.
At the same time, Sisvel accused Chinese company TCL of infringing patents through the sale of Alcatel mobile handsets. The Alcatel brand, which is owned by Nokia, is used under licence by TCL.
In the suits, the European licensor is seeking a finding of infringement and damages.
David Muus, programme manager of Sisvel’s mobile communication programme, said that the company coordinated the timing of the filings to make it convenient for the courts to group cases on the same schedule and handle them efficiently.
“This is part of a continued effort of Sisvel to license patents that are believed to be essential to cellular standards … as well as to discourage hold-out behaviour. We believe litigation should be a last resort in the licensing process, however when confronted with ‘efficient infringement’ strategies we sometimes find ourselves with little other option than to stand by our rights,” he added.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.
Today's top stories
Toyota's flying car mark blocked by Sky
Sisvel accuses Dell, TCL, and Tesla of patent infringement
Google, Apple, and Alibaba named in video game clone suit
Counterfeiting up by a third since start of pandemic: report
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk