orhan-cam-shutterstock-com-us-supreme-court-

24 February 2016Patents

SCOTUS hearing: Halo and Stryker cases create ‘trolls v pirates’ debate

A US Supreme Court case that centres on enhanced damages in patent infringement cases may create a new characterisation of “trolls versus pirates”.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Stryker v Zimmer: Federal Circuit rules that infringement was wilful

14 September 2016 The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed an earlier district court ruling of wilful infringement but has remanded the award of triple damages in the latest patent case between medical devices companies Stryker and Zimmer.

Patents

Halo and Stryker cases: SCOTUS relaxes standard for enhanced patent damages

13 June 2016 The US Supreme Court has today decided to relax the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s test for awarding enhanced damages in patent cases.

Patents

WIPR survey: Readers call on SCOTUS to reverse Halo and Stryker rulings

6 March 2016 WIPR readers have said the US Supreme Court should overturn lower court rulings in two patent infringement cases that centre on enhanced damages.

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies

SEPs now searchable on WIPO’s global patent database

INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting

'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system

Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates

WATCH: Finding a new balance in IP protection with trade secret protection

Optis v Apple: How the court calculated the royalty rate

Cahill expands practice with three-partner team from King & Spalding

SCOTUS hearing: Halo and Stryker cases create ‘trolls v pirates’ debate

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles