Stryker v Zimmer: Federal Circuit rules that infringement was wilful
14-09-2016
Halo and Stryker cases: SCOTUS relaxes standard for enhanced patent damages
13-06-2016
WIPR survey: Readers call on SCOTUS to reverse Halo and Stryker rulings
06-03-2016
Orhan Cam / Shutterstock.com
A US Supreme Court case that centres on enhanced damages in patent infringement cases may create a new characterisation of “trolls versus pirates”.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
US Supreme Court, enhanced patent damages, Halo v Pulse, Stryker v Zimmer, Octane Fitness v Icon, oral arguments, wilful patent infringement
