24 April 2020TrademarksRory O'Neill

Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers

Yesterday’s US Supreme Court ruling in Romag v Fossil is the latest effort to erase categorical rules on remedies for IP infringement, lawyers have told WIPR.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

SCOTUS grapples with ‘wilfulness’ in TM infringement

15 January 2020 US Supreme Court justices presiding over a closely-watched case are so far struggling with the notion of “wilfulness” as a requirement for awarding profits in trademark infringement cases.

Trademarks

SCOTUS preview: justices consider profits awards for TM infringement

10 January 2020 The US Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next week in a key dispute that is likely to have ramifications for what remedies courts can apply for trademark infringement.

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies

INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting

Iconix, dupe culture and the risk of post-sale confusion

'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system

Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates

Cahill expands practice with three-partner team from King & Spalding

Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history

Wouter Pors leaves Bird & Bird for boutique Dutch firm

Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles