• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Littlewoods handed unwanted seasonal lawsuit
13 December 2013Copyright

Littlewoods handed unwanted seasonal lawsuit

Online retailer Littlewoods is facing a lawsuit from an Irish company following a dispute over the design for a Christmas jumper.

Portlaoise-based Zatori Results Ltd claims Littlewoods has infringed its design by manufacturing a jumper almost identical to one it sold last year.

It has taken the case to the Irish High Court, where it is expected to be heard within the next week.

The disputed design includes a snowman in the middle of the jumper surrounded by stars and a moon and sleigh. It has two Christmas trees on either side of the snowman against a blue background.

Zatori, which employs 87 people, sells items, including clothing online and says Littlewoods is offering a similar jumper for sale on various websites.

In an affidavit, on Wednesday December 11, Ronan O’Brien, the founder of Zatori, said he had designed the jumper for last year’s Christmas market.

He noted that on the defendant’s websites they had started selling a jumper which, despite having slight differences, including the omission of the moon and sleigh, was almost identical to the Zatori design.

The original jumper, made of a mix of good quality wool and acrylic, was sold through its website clothing.ie and was one of the top selling Christmas jumpers on online retailer Amazon.

Sarah Byrt, partner at Mayer Brown LLP, in London, said Zatori was relying on its unregistered design right, an EU-wide right [EU Council Regulation 6/2002], which lasts for three years and helps those in the fashion sector protect seasonal designs which don’t need the extra cost involved in getting a registration.

“Since the Littlewoods jumper apparently doesn’t include the moon and reindeer-drawn sleigh which also feature in the Zatori design, Zatori will have to show that its rights are nevertheless being infringed by arguing that the Littlewoods jumper gives the same ‘overall impression’ on the ‘informed user’,” Byrt said.

Zatori is seeking an interim injunction preventing the defendant from continuing to offer the jumper for sale. It is also seeking damages for the alleged infringement of its unregistered design rights.

Byrt added that, given the seasonal nature of the product, Zatori was using an “emergency procedure”.

“It looks as though the decision on an interim injunction, which will come before the Irish court in the next few days, if successful, it would order Littlewoods to stop selling straight away,” Byrt said.

Mr Justice Sean Ryan said he would deal with the matter within the next week.

Littlewoods and Zatori both declined to comment.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

Squires plays rare reexamination of Pokémon gaming patent
Patents
Squires plays rare reexamination of Pokémon gaming patent
5 November 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Squires plays rare reexamination of Pokémon gaming patent
5 November 2025
Patents
AI industry exceptions could muddy IP protection, says House counsel
31 October 2025
Trademarks
AI fighting AI: Groq and Oura weigh in on the new brand battle
31 October 2025
Trademarks
‘We're being attacked from all sides’: Thermo Fisher Scientific counsel
30 October 2025
Patents
USPTO flags ‘foreign state-backed actors’ threat in stricter disclosure shift
29 October 2025
AI
WATCH: Untangling liability in AI systems—who’s responsible when things go wrong?
29 October 2025

More articles

AI is an upstart teen: Meta, Adobe counsel on where the tech is at
Thyssenkrupp counsel: ‘Ten-page opinions? I can’t use them’
BREAKING: UK court deals blow to Getty in AI copyright battle
WATCH: AI vs copyright—tackling the new creative battleground
Novartis counsel warns: ‘Don’t let AI develop without our input’
Stripe out: Adidas’ appeal in Thom Browne dispute is a lesson in precision
Squires: ‘Inherited patent backlog was an absolute dumpster fire’
AI industry exceptions could muddy IP protection, says House counsel

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin