shutterstock_325058183_crystal51
30 September 2020PatentsRory O'Neill

China publishes SEP antitrust guidelines

China has published new guidelines on antitrust issues associated with patent pooling and the licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs).

The guidelines, published September 28 the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), avoid precise definitions of anti-competitive behaviour, but outline key factors to be considered when assessing antitrust risks.

While patent pooling can reduce transaction costs, “it may also exclude or restrict competition,” said a translated version of the guidelines published by the National Law Review.

This depends on factors including the patent owners’ market share, and whether they license the IP at “unfairly high prices”.

The guidelines also highlighted the risk of SEP owners using a dominant market position to extract inflated licensing fees.

The SAMR said authorities should take the “behaviour of the negotiating parties in the negotiation process and their true wishes” into account. This should include the licensing offers made by both parties during negotiations.

A landmark ruling from Germany’s top court in July stipulated that companies seeking access to SEP-protected IP must demonstrate themselves to be a “willing licensee” in negotiations.

The judgment came after SEP patent pool operator Sisvel accused Chinese smartphone maker Haier of frustrating negotiations with so-called “hold-out” tactics.

Haier, meanwhile, accused Sisvel of failing to offer its IP on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

The German court endorsed the view of Justice Colin Birss of the English Court of Appeal, who wrote in his 2017 decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei that a “willing licensee must be one willing to take a FRAND licence on whatever terms are in fact FRAND”.

The Chinese company failed to meet this obligation during negotiations with Sisvel, the court concluded, but Haier has challenged the ruling at the country’s Constitutional Court.

Birss discussed the fall out from the influential Unwired Planet decision during a recent interview with LSPN Connect.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Today’s top stories

Patent owners to recover £1.1bn in tax relief, HMRC reveals

USITC targets Ikea and GE in bulb investigation

UEFA wins piracy injunction at Irish High Court

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
28 September 2020   Ahead of his appointment to the English Court of Appeal, LSPN Connect spoke with Justice Colin Birss in a typically frank and wide-ranging interview, including the fall-out from Unwired Planet v Huawei.
Patents
3 July 2020   The German Federal Court of Justice’s judgment in Sisvel v Haier establishes a more pro-patent owner standard for FRAND licensing negotiations than seen in Germany before, argued lawyers for Sisvel.
Trademarks
23 December 2020   China is set to impose heftier criminal penalties for IP infringement, according to draft reforms submitted to legislators this week.