shutterstock_1959832546_sharomka
9 November 2023PatentsMarisa Woutersen

Amazon ordered to pay $46.7m over voice software

Delaware jury rules Amazon infringed four patents | VoiceBox accused Amazon of patent infringement with the Alexa and Echo products | Company’s Cybermind speaker was built in 2001.

Amazon has been hit with a $46.7 million damages verdict in its dispute with VoiceBox Technologies over voice software technology.

The US District Court for the District of Delaware jury found yesterday, November 8, that Amazon had committed willful infringement of four of VoiceBox’s patents.

Washington-based VoiceBox filed its complaint in October 2019.

The lawsuit alleged that Amazon violated VoiceBox's patent rights in the development and implementation of its Alexa virtual assistant and Echo product line.

VoiceBox claimed to have invented 'Echo-like' products long before Amazon and owns the US patents: 8,073,681; 9,015,049; 9,626,703; 7,818,176; 8,886,536; and 9,269,097.

These patents are seen as fundamental to the development of voice commerce technology.

The complaint alleged that VoiceBox’s opportunities to promote and build a business based on these patents were “crushed” when Amazon introduced the Echo and Alexa Products and used its “enormous size and clout to poach dozens of VoiceBox Technologies’ engineers and scientists”.

Cybermind speaker built in 2001

VoiceBox created its early prototype voice-controlled speaker, Cybermind, in 2001.

It gained recognition when Toyota hired the company to build a natural-language understanding speech interface for its Lexus automobiles—a personal assistant called Alexus.

The suit also alleged that meetings between VoiceBox and Amazon occurred in 2011, where VoiceBox presented its patented technology.

Despite positive feedback, Amazon allegedly decided to build its Alexa products without obtaining permission from or informing VoiceBox.

Additionally, Amazon hired Philippe Di Cristo, VoiceBox’ chief scientist, in 2016, who was alleged to have played a crucial role in incorporating VoiceBox's tech into the Alexa products.

The counsel for VoiceBox was Ian Liston, Edward Poplawski, Erik Carlson, Ryan Benyamin, James Yoon, and Ryan Smith from  Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
1 November 2023   Finnish multinational accuses e-commerce giant and another tech company of ‘not playing by the rules’ | Dispute concerns video-related technology | Suits include a complaint filed at Unified Patent Court.
Patents
2 October 2023   US District Court upholds magistrate's recommendations in case | Amazon is accused of patent infringement of operational tech and methods using augmented reality.
Patents
21 December 2023   Notifications to the e-commerce company’s infringement system fell within the unjustified threats statutory regime | Communication issues arose in a patent dispute between US and Chinese lithium-ion battery manufacturers.