frank60 / Shutterstock.com
20 May 2024FeaturesJurisdiction reportsVictor Adames of BCB Law & Business

The future of IP in an AI-powered world

Victor Adames of BCB Law & Business explores the dynamic intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property, discussing both the challenges and opportunities it presents.

In the dynamic landscape of technology and innovation, the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and intellectual property presents complex challenges and opportunities. From copyright attribution to patentability and data ownership, the regulatory framework governing AI within IP is evolving to address emerging issues and safeguard the rights of creators, innovators, and users.

At the forefront of this is the debate surrounding AI-generated content and its implications for copyright law. AI algorithms, trained on vast datasets, are increasingly capable of producing original works across various mediums, from music compositions to visual art and literature. However, the question of who owns the copyright to these AI-generated works remains a subject of contention.

Traditionally, copyright laws attribute authorship to human creators based on the exercise of skill, labour, and creativity. Yet, AI lacks human agency and consciousness, challenging established notions of authorship and entitlement to copyright protection. Legal frameworks vary across jurisdictions, with some countries recognising AI as a tool of human creators and others advocating for sui generis rights for AI-generated works.

In the US, the Copyright Office has stated that copyright protection extends to original works created by human authors, excluding works produced by non-human agents such as AI. In the upcoming months, the Copyright Office will issue an analysis of the impact of AI on copyright for making further recommendations for legislative actions. Conversely, the European Union is exploring the possibility of granting legal personality to AI systems, enabling them to own intellectual property rights independently. 

Other countries like the UK and Japan have already started to recognise AI-generated works for copyright protection. In Mexico, there have been initiatives and efforts to regulate AI and copyright, however, nothing official yet.

Moreover, issues of fair use and transformative works further complicate the legal landscape of AI and copyright. Determining whether AI-generated content qualifies as a transformative or derivative work subject to copyright infringement requires careful examination of the creative process and the extent of human input.

Protecting rights in the AI era

Beyond copyright, AI technologies raise questions regarding patentability and data ownership. Patent offices worldwide are grappling with the eligibility of AI-generated inventions for patent protection, while companies investing in data collection and curation seek to protect their proprietary datasets through trade secrets and contractual agreements.

Additionally, concerns surrounding data privacy and consent arise when utilising personal data in AI applications. Compliance with data protection regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU, is crucial to ensuring the ethical and legal use of AI technologies.

Trademark infringement by AI entities is another area of concern, as AI-powered systems may inadvertently use protected brand names or logos without authorisation. Companies must implement measures to ensure that AI entities comply with trademark laws and do not engage in activities that could dilute or misappropriate trademark rights.

In cases where AI algorithms produce content that infringes upon the rights of third parties, questions of liability emerge. Determining responsibility for AI-generated content may involve considerations of negligence, vicarious liability, or strict liability, necessitating the development of legal frameworks that assign accountability appropriately.

Unlocking potential

Despite these challenges, AI technologies offer unprecedented opportunities for innovation and creativity. Blockchain-based platforms, for instance, provide transparent and immutable records of IP ownership, facilitating the management and monetisation of AI-generated content.

As the regulatory landscape evolves, collaboration between policymakers, legal experts, industry stakeholders, and academia is essential to develop effective and equitable solutions that balance the interests of creators, users, and society at large. 

In conclusion, AI and IP represents a frontier of both promise and complexity. As AI technologies continue to push the boundaries of creativity and innovation, the legal framework governing their interaction with IP rights must adapt to address emerging challenges while upholding fundamental principles of fairness, accountability, and innovation.

While navigating the legal frontiers of AI within intellectual property presents complex challenges, it also offers opportunities for fostering innovation, promoting access to knowledge, and protecting the rights of creators and innovators. 

Initiatives such as blockchain-based platforms and ethical guidelines for AI development and deployment hold promise for shaping a future where AI and intellectual property coexist harmoniously, driving progress and advancing human creativity. 

As AI continues to evolve, it will be very interesting to see how this is regulated.

Victor Adames is a senior partner in the Trademark and Copyright Practice at BCB Law & Business. He can be contacted at: vadames@bcb.com.mx


More on this story

Future of IP
10 May 2024   Minister for AI and IP predicts changes to legislation will form part of eventual solution | Members of the House of Lords urged the government to take a position swiftly.
Future of IP
15 May 2024   BigTech comments diverge on proposals over how much human oversight is needed for AI-assisted inventions | Google welcomes “step in the right direction” but IBM and Qualcomm request more clarification and better definitions of the tech | Office’s reliance on Pannu v Iolab questioned by leading AI patent owner.

More on this story

Future of IP
10 May 2024   Minister for AI and IP predicts changes to legislation will form part of eventual solution | Members of the House of Lords urged the government to take a position swiftly.
Future of IP
15 May 2024   BigTech comments diverge on proposals over how much human oversight is needed for AI-assisted inventions | Google welcomes “step in the right direction” but IBM and Qualcomm request more clarification and better definitions of the tech | Office’s reliance on Pannu v Iolab questioned by leading AI patent owner.