istock-458596075code6d
11 January 2019

EU investigating Nike over IP licensing and tax structure

The European Commission has announced it is investigating Nike for an IP licensing arrangement which may have helped it avoid tax in the Netherlands.

In a statement issued yesterday, January 10, the Commission said it is investigating the tax arrangements of two Nike subsidiaries: Nike European Operations Netherlands and Converse Netherlands.

The two companies licensed Nike’s IP rights in return for royalties which are not taxable in the Netherlands.

According to the Commission, Dutch authorities issued five tax rulings from 2006 to 2015, two of which are still in force, which determine the royalty to be paid by the two companies for use of the IP.

The Commission expressed its concern that “the royalty payments endorsed by the rulings may not reflect economic reality”. A preliminary assessment by the Commission concluded that the licence royalties “appear higher than what would normally be negotiated on market terms”.

The recipients of the royalty payments, the statement said, “are Nike group entities that have no employees and do not carry out any economic activity”.

If the Dutch tax rulings gave Nike an advantage allowing it to pay less tax than other companies, it would amount to “illegal state aid”, the Commission warned.

Margrethe Vestager, commissioner in charge of competition policy, said that EU member states “should not allow companies to set up complex structures that unduly reduce their taxable profits”.

The Commission will carefully examine Nike’s tax arrangements in the Netherlands and “assess whether it is in line with EU State aid rules,” Vestager added.

Vestager also welcomed actions taken by the Dutch government to reform its corporation tax rules, which she hoped would help “ensure that companies operate on a level playing field”.

In a statement sent to WIPR, a Nike spokesperson said that the company “rigorously ensures that it complies with all the same tax laws as other companies operating in the Netherlands”.

Nike believes that the “European Commission’s investigation is without merit,” the spokesperson added.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
3 September 2019   Dutch lawmakers are investigating why Uber was able to claim a $6.1 billion “tax write-off” by moving IP assets to the Netherlands, it has been reported.
Patents
20 July 2020   The European Commission has launched a competition inquiry into the Internet of Things sector, focusing on potentially abusive practices related to standards and data.
Patents
14 April 2021   Covering as many bases as you can is essential for both parties when drafting a license agreement. If and when disputes arise, you want to avoid as many pitfalls as possible to avoid litigation, and failing that, an unfavorable outcome.