• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • INTA 2024
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2024
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • US band The Turtles accuse broadcaster of $100m copyright infringement
turtles
6 August 2013Copyright

US band The Turtles accuse broadcaster of $100m copyright infringement

US rock band The Turtles is leading a backlash against a satellite radio station claiming it has infringed copyright on thousands of songs to the tune of $100 million.

The suit has been brought as a class action, led by the band’s former frontmen Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, on behalf of a string of artists.

In court documents filed at the Los Angeles Superior Court on August 1, they accuse SiriusXM of infringing on thousands of artists’ work, by broadcasting, without permission, works predating 1972.

Under US law, works that predate 1972 fall outside the federal Copyright Act 1976.

“There is a doctrine which says that federal law will pre-empt state law protection, which means that if congress doesn’t protect something, the state can’t enforce protection either,” said Jenevieve Maerker, associate at Foley Hoag LLP in Boston.

“However, in sound recording cases there is an exception which allows rights holders to retain copyright-like protections under state law until 2067, if individual states provide it.”

According to the plaintiffs, under California’s civil code, pre-1972 sound recordings are protected against unauthorised duplication.

Compensation and statutory royalty rates are determined by the The Copyright Royalty Board while the non-profit SoundExchange collects and distributes appropriate royalties.

Two years ago, SoundExchange requested that SiriusXM start documenting every song it was paying for, but the broadcaster has allegedly stopped reporting pre-1972 songs, leaving artists bereft of payments.

The Turtles, (suing under its frontmen’s adopted stage names Flo and Eddie), claim they, and other artists, are entitled to compensation from the thousands of songs transmitted across SiriusXM’s various radio stations.

The complaint says that the broadcaster is, and will continue to, “cause enormous and irreparable harm,” unless substantial damages are awarded.

Hillel Parness, partner at Robins Kaplan Miller and Ciresi LLP, in New York, said the case provided “a strong reminder” of the challenges that “continue to confront copyright owners in the digital age.”

“Here, a key question will be whether California law provides a public performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings. SiriusXM has already publicly taken the position that there is no such right, while SoundExchange has expressed an alternative view, and plaintiffs appear motivated to test the proposition,” he said.

Describing itself as “the world’s leading radio broadcaster,” SiriusXM provides news, music, sports and entertainment. It has around 24 million subscribers and its content is available via satellite, online and on smartphones and other connected devices.

The suit is demanding that, alongside $100m in damages, the broadcaster stops playing pre-1972 songs.

“Looking at the laws it would seem the plaintiffs have a pretty good case,” said Maerker, “the defence may be that the plaintiffs have been sitting on their rights, but that would seem unlikely as they were apparently getting paid until quite recently,” she added.

“The case is also a reflection of the highly complicated nature of the US copyright system and music industry, and the need for copyright owners to maintain vigilance in order to make sure that they are being properly compensated for the use of their music,” said Parness.

The Turtles, who were together from 1965 to 1970, had hits include Happy Together, It Ain't Me Babe and She'd Rather Be With Me.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
SiriusXM to appeal against Turtles ruling
3 October 2014   Satellite radio station SiriusXM has said it will appeal against a court ruling that found it guilty of infringing the copyright of certain songs belonging to 1960s rock band The Turtles.
article
Turtles victorious in satellite radio dispute
24 September 2014   A judge has backed 1960s US rock band The Turtles in its copyright infringement dispute against a satellite radio station.


Editor's picks

Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025
Trademarks
Thatchers, Skykick and dupes: What’s on a fashion IP influencer’s radar?
30 April 2025
Patents
Why US patent reform is ‘essential’ for US economic prosperity and security
28 April 2025
Patents
G1/23 ruling: Why a pending EPO decision threatens decade-old products
28 April 2025
Diversity
WIPR Diversity & Inclusion reveals Top 100 People in IP for 2025
23 April 2025
Trademarks
Resilience and the power of brands: Elisabeth Stewart Bradley on 9/11, inclusion and the INTA presidency
22 April 2025

More articles

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies
INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting
'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system
Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates
Cahill expands practice with three-partner team from King & Spalding
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
US-China tariffs: What hope is there for IP rightsholders?
Lenovo Global IP Litigation director joins O'Melveny

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin