16 June 2016Copyright

SCOTUS sets rules for attorneys’ fees in copyright cases

The US Supreme Court has today clarified when judges should award attorneys’ fees in copyright cases, saying that although “objective reasonableness” carries weight, courts must view cases on “their own terms”.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Arts organisation wades into Kirtsaeng v John Wiley dispute

1 April 2016 A company that provides arts-related legal aid and volunteer programmes has stepped into a forthcoming US Supreme Court battle centring on whether attorneys’ fees should be awarded in a renowned copyright case.

US Supreme Court to review attorneys’ fee awards in copyright cases

19 January 2016 Publisher John Wiley & Sons and a graduate from Cornell University are heading back to the US Supreme Court after a writ concerning the standard for awarding attorneys’ fees in copyright cases was granted.

SCOTUS decision on copyright attorneys’ fees should bring comfort, say lawyers

17 June 2016 The US Supreme Court’s decision yesterday on when judges should award attorneys’ fees in copyright cases should give “comfort” to lawyers and their clients, attorneys have said.

‘It hurts’: Australia reels after ‘Uggs’ forced to rename abroad

High-profile litigator Mary-Olga (Mo) Lovett starts independent practice

On our radar… Panasonic’s SEP deals, Disney row, and USPTO’s AI plan

AI-driven study reveals China's semiconductor surge

Getty loses bid to represent photographers in Stability AI case

UK govt aims for balancing act in ambitious AI plan

Hytera admits it stole Motorola’s trade secrets in case tied to DoJ charge

Will Walmart’s Birkin gambit be worth it in the end?

SCOTUS sets rules for attorneys’ fees in copyright cases

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles