Saudi Arabia breached TRIPS over beoutQ, WTO finds
Saudi Arabia blocked Qatari broadcaster beIN Media from enforcing its IP and enabled pirate sports broadcasts, the World Trade Organization (WTO) has said.
In a highly-anticipated report published yesterday, June 16, the WTO said Saudi Arabia’s non-application of criminal sanctions to pirate broadcaster beoutQ could not be justified on national security grounds. The report also concluded that Saudi Arabia had not met its obligations under the TRIPS Agreement.
In its defence, Saudi Arabia cited the “emergency in international relations” with Qatar, and its policy of ending contact with Qatari nationals. On that basis, the Kingdom argued that its actions were taken to protect its “essential security interests”.
But this argument was “so remote from” the issue of beoutQ that it did not "meet a minimum requirement of plausibility”, the WTO panel said.
The report’s findings will weigh on the English Premier League, who are evaluating a proposed takeover of Newcastle United by a Saudi-backed consortium.
News of the takeover raised questions about Saudi human rights abuses, with the partner of murdered Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi accusing Crown Prince Mohamed Bin Salman of attempting to salvage his image with the purchase.
But concerns over Saudi’s alleged support of pirated sports broadcasts, including Premier League matches, could be just as, if not more persuasive.
The Guardian reported last month that the takeover was in “serious doubt” amid rumours of the WTO’s likely findings on the Saudi government’s failure to tackle beoutQ.
Typically of the dispute, both Qatari and Saudi governments are claiming victory in the wake of the report’s publication.
Saudi Arabia claimed that the WTO found the Kingdom’s national security defence to be “justified”.
The WTO did conclude that Saudi Arabia was entitled to block beIN from procuring independent legal counsel in the Kingdom on national security grounds.
But this defence was not valid in relation to the failure to apply criminal sanctions to beoutQ, the panel said.
Lawyers from Sidney Austin law firm, who advised the Qatari government at the WTO, welcomed the panel’s findings.
“This historic result marks the first time in the 73-year history of multilateral trade rules that a WTO panel has rejected a party’s national security defence,” said Iain Sandford, partner at the firm.
“Today’s unprecedented decision shows how a state that is determined to play by the rules can use international adjudication to ensure that others do the same,” he added.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.
Today's top stories
Monster Energy secures 'Monster Munch' TM win
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk