• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Mexican filmmakers cleared in image rights scandal
shutterstock-63339079-web
12 February 2014Copyright

Mexican filmmakers cleared in image rights scandal

A pair of Mexican filmmakers who made a documentary about a high profile murder case have been spared a multi-million-dollar fine over an image rights dispute.

The film’s director and producer, Layda Negrete and Roberto Hernandez, were accused of using an image of a murdered man without the permission of his family, and one of a witness in the case without his authorisation.

However, they were cleared of wrong-doing and spared a $225 million dollar fine.

The lawsuit was filed by relatives of Juan Carlos Reyes who was murdered in 2005 in Mexico City and on whose murder the film is based.

The film, Presumed Guilty, premiered in 2011 and told the story of how an innocent man, Toño Zúñiga, was convicted for the murder.

However, the victim’s family said they suffered "moral damage" because the film showed Reyes' dead body despite the documentary makers not having permission.

Furthermore, Victor Daniel Reyes Bravo, a cousin of the victim and the eyewitness on whose testimony the case was based, also sought damages from the pair.

Reyes Bravo, who admits on screen that he never saw the person who shot his cousin, did not dispute the accuracy of the film but claimed he never gave the filmmakers permission to include his image.

The film played a crucial role in getting a re-trial which reversed Zúñiga’s sentence; despite the fact it was banned shortly after its release pending the conclusion of the lawsuits.

On January 31, Mexico City Civil Court Judge Norma Alejandra Muñoz ruled in favour of the filmmakers.

“The key rule that we can bring from this case is that image rights will have a special effect concerning documentaries or audio visual news productions where the end result is used to provide news,” said Luis Schmidt, attorney at Olivares & Cia In Mexico City, who represented the documentary makers.

“Firstly, the judge ruled that the complainants had not objectively proved that the situation affected them and secondly there was not a need for authorisation where someone is documenting fact for journalism and news reports.”

Schmidt added: “This was considered to be journalistic piece of work and an investigation and is great news for future broadcasts.”

The plaintiffs have been given 12 days in which to appeal.

Negrete and Hernandez still face another civil suit brought by the police officer who arrested Zuñiga and who is also featured in the documentary.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025
AI
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025

More articles

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?
Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS
Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal
How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin