• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • First Amendment protects ‘The Hurt Locker’ from publicity rights claim
iurii-shutterstock-com-soldier-
22 February 2016Copyright

First Amendment protects ‘The Hurt Locker’ from publicity rights claim

Academy Award-winning film “The Hurt Locker” is protected by the First Amendment and did not infringe a US soldier’s publicity rights, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
It is where you are, not who you are, that counts
17 November 2020   Despite there being little international harmonisation, rights of publicity exist in various forms across the world—and there are common pitfalls, Tom Phillips finds.


Editor's picks

What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
22 December 2025

Editor's picks

AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
22 December 2025
Trademarks
X strikes back against Twitter.new
17 December 2025
Trade secrets
Aon sues new US rival for ‘poaching employees and taking boxloads of secrets’
17 December 2025
Trademarks
Rings of power: Oura counsel on protecting an $11bn brand
15 December 2025
Trademarks
Five firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s USA Trademarks Rankings
12 December 2025
Patents
5 ways director Squires is changing US innovation
10 December 2025

More articles

Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 1
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
Streaming setback: Nokia loses bid to shut down UK SEP dispute
Hogan Lovells and Cadwalader strike historic deal to create $3.6bn firm
Quantum innovation accelerating but funding gaps stall commercial shift
X strikes back against Twitter.new
Aon sues new US rival for ‘poaching employees and taking boxloads of secrets’

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin