• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • CJEU clarifies TPM rules in Nintendo dispute
parvis-web
Photo: Court of Justice of the European Union
24 January 2014Copyright

CJEU clarifies TPM rules in Nintendo dispute

Europe’s highest court has ruled that technological prevention measures (TPMs) connected between a video games console and the game itself are legal.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
CJEU says German court has jurisdiction over French company in Nintendo case
3 October 2017   Europe’s highest court has ruled on a designs dispute between video games company Nintendo and a maker of console accessories, finding that a German court does have jurisdiction over a French defendant.


Editor's picks

How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods
Trademarks
How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods
31 March 2026

Editor's picks

Trademarks
How we won $3m+ for an influencer against Impossible Foods
31 March 2026
Patents
How a hair curling patent dispute reached Europe’s highest court
27 March 2026
Trademarks
EU zeroes in on China’s e-commerce giants as AliExpress faces grilling
25 March 2026
AI
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
20 March 2026
AI
UK makes U-turn as government drops AI copyright exception
18 March 2026
Trademarks
Who owns a name? Katy Perry, Estée Lauder and Jo Malone test rights
16 March 2026

More articles

How a hair curling patent dispute reached Europe’s highest court
Cox v Sony: SCOTUS trims ISP liability in ‘seismic decision’
EPO filings hit record high as AI and quantum drive renewed growth
Why Mars is using behavioural psychology to help tackle lookalikes
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
WIPO launches initiative to evolve IP infrastructure in age of AI
UK makes U-turn as government drops AI copyright exception
HSF Kramer hires patent litigator as partner in Germany

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin