• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • CJEU clarifies TPM rules in Nintendo dispute
parvis-web
Photo: Court of Justice of the European Union
24 January 2014Copyright

CJEU clarifies TPM rules in Nintendo dispute

Europe’s highest court has ruled that technological prevention measures (TPMs) connected between a video games console and the game itself are legal.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
CJEU says German court has jurisdiction over French company in Nintendo case
3 October 2017   Europe’s highest court has ruled on a designs dispute between video games company Nintendo and a maker of console accessories, finding that a German court does have jurisdiction over a French defendant.


Editor's picks

‘Alright, alright, alright’: Will Hollywood’s A-list follow McConaughey’s TM lead?
Trademarks
‘Alright, alright, alright’: Will Hollywood’s A-list follow McConaughey’s TM lead?
19 January 2026

Editor's picks

Trademarks
‘Alright, alright, alright’: Will Hollywood’s A-list follow McConaughey’s TM lead?
19 January 2026
In-House
Final call: Who are the world’s best in-house counsel?
16 January 2026
Patents
What IPR and PGR institutions mean under USPTO director Squires
12 January 2026
Copyright
Top Gun: Maverick suit nosedives on copyright and contract claims
5 January 2026
Patents
PTAB year in review: A shifting landscape and outlook for 2026
2 January 2026
Patents
UPC: A review of 2025 and what to expect in 2026
30 December 2025

More articles

King & Spalding adds music-focussed duo in New York
US in-house counsel brace for funder-fuelled litigation in 2026
Final call: Who are the world’s best in-house counsel?
Danone unit and Arla benefit from ‘liquid gold’ whey protein ruling
Nokia’s new licensing chief reveals deals with social media companies
Trademark exhaustion boils over: AGA’s ‘rare’ case explained
Nokia ends global dispute with major consumer electronics company
Why the US is poised for a patent litigation surge in 2026

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin