• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Beatles tribute acts locked in copyright battle
17 July 2013Copyright

Beatles tribute acts locked in copyright battle

Rival tribute shows to British band The Beatles have become locked in a copyright infringement dispute over claims one musical copied another.

The producers of Let It Be, which had a stint in London’s West End and is about to open on Broadway in the US, are being sued by US production Rain, which claims it came up with the idea for a staged tribute to the group first.

In a dispute filed at the Southern District Court of New York, Rain Corp, the company which produced Rain, is demanding a 50-50 share of profits from Let it Be and to be listed as a joint author.

Rain Corp claims Let it Be uses too many of the same songs, similar stage artwork, and that the appearance and dialogue of actors portraying the so-called ‘fab four’ infringes on its copyright.

A filed complaint states the defendants had “misappropriated” copyrighted work “without credit or compensation” and deprived Rain Corp of artistic control over its show, which appeared on Broadway in 2010 and 2011.

But Peter Cane, one of Let It Be's lawyers, told  The New York Times that the copyright claim was unfounded.

He said: "How do you monopolise the ability to present an impersonation of The Beatles? How many different ways can you really do it?"

Speaking to WIPR, Paul Fakler, partner at Arent Fox LLP, said he agreed with Cane, admitting it would be a “big stretch” for the claims to succeed on a purely copyright basis.

“If the only similarities are singing and looking and sounding like The Beatles that isn’t to going to hold up as a substantial claim,” he said.

“My understanding is that the Rain show was essentially a Beatles tribute band concert. There was no story or ‘book’ in the traditional theatrical sense, other than a few instances of stage banter. Rain Corp does not own the copyright to The Beatles’ songs, various music producers do. Rain also does not own a copyright in the way that the Beatles dressed, sang or spoke. Unless their variations are so creative that they could get their own copyright I would struggle to see the claims succeed.”

According to Rain Corp, Let It Be producers Jeff Parry and Annerin Productions had agreed to collaborate on a show, Rain—A Tribute, with it in 2005.

Fakler added: “Unless the Rain producers added additional creative elements of dialogue or staging that were so original (and not based on historical fact) that they could get their own copyright and the Let It Be producers closely copied those few original elements, I would struggle to see how the claims could succeed.”

Let It Be is due to open on Broadway in the coming weeks.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

Louis Vuitton loses ‘Frankenstein products’ battle
Trademarks
Louis Vuitton loses ‘Frankenstein products’ battle
26 February 2026

Editor's picks

Trademarks
Louis Vuitton loses ‘Frankenstein products’ battle
26 February 2026
Trademarks
Exclusive interview: ‘Oatly decision is an aid to brands, not a challenge’
18 February 2026
Patents
Emotional Perception exclusive: ‘We are now very much open for business’
16 February 2026
Patents
New WIPR rankings recognise top US patent firms and lawyers
13 February 2026
Patents
Reaction: Emotional Perception decision is ‘good for UK PLC’
11 February 2026
Patents
BREAKING: UK ruling ‘future-proofs’ patentability for AI and computer tech
11 February 2026

More articles

Nokia agrees to UK-set FRAND rate in global Warner-Paramount feud
Ex-Amazon associate general counsel joins Morgan Lewis
Ex-Disney counsel joins Motion Picture Association to combat global piracy
Oracle senior managing counsel: ‘Brutal honesty is really helpful’
Anthropic names Chinese labs ‘targeting’ Claude with mass prompts
Wiggin’s new litigation partner deepens ‘technically complex’ offer
Silicon Valley engineers accused of taking Google trade secrets to Iran
Gaming platform owner wins ‘patent troll’ case against prolific inventor

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin