• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Community & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Trademarks
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Influential Women in IP 2026
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Beatles tribute acts locked in copyright battle
17 July 2013Copyright

Beatles tribute acts locked in copyright battle

Rival tribute shows to British band The Beatles have become locked in a copyright infringement dispute over claims one musical copied another.

The producers of Let It Be, which had a stint in London’s West End and is about to open on Broadway in the US, are being sued by US production Rain, which claims it came up with the idea for a staged tribute to the group first.

In a dispute filed at the Southern District Court of New York, Rain Corp, the company which produced Rain, is demanding a 50-50 share of profits from Let it Be and to be listed as a joint author.

Rain Corp claims Let it Be uses too many of the same songs, similar stage artwork, and that the appearance and dialogue of actors portraying the so-called ‘fab four’ infringes on its copyright.

A filed complaint states the defendants had “misappropriated” copyrighted work “without credit or compensation” and deprived Rain Corp of artistic control over its show, which appeared on Broadway in 2010 and 2011.

But Peter Cane, one of Let It Be's lawyers, told  The New York Times that the copyright claim was unfounded.

He said: "How do you monopolise the ability to present an impersonation of The Beatles? How many different ways can you really do it?"

Speaking to WIPR, Paul Fakler, partner at Arent Fox LLP, said he agreed with Cane, admitting it would be a “big stretch” for the claims to succeed on a purely copyright basis.

“If the only similarities are singing and looking and sounding like The Beatles that isn’t to going to hold up as a substantial claim,” he said.

“My understanding is that the Rain show was essentially a Beatles tribute band concert. There was no story or ‘book’ in the traditional theatrical sense, other than a few instances of stage banter. Rain Corp does not own the copyright to The Beatles’ songs, various music producers do. Rain also does not own a copyright in the way that the Beatles dressed, sang or spoke. Unless their variations are so creative that they could get their own copyright I would struggle to see the claims succeed.”

According to Rain Corp, Let It Be producers Jeff Parry and Annerin Productions had agreed to collaborate on a show, Rain—A Tribute, with it in 2005.

Fakler added: “Unless the Rain producers added additional creative elements of dialogue or staging that were so original (and not based on historical fact) that they could get their own copyright and the Let It Be producers closely copied those few original elements, I would struggle to see how the claims could succeed.”

Let It Be is due to open on Broadway in the coming weeks.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
Copyright
No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
30 July 2026

Editor's picks

Copyright
No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
30 July 2026
AI
Are you listening, Prime Minister?
24 July 2026
Patents
Second UPC injunction piles pressure on Disney
24 July 2026
Patents
What UK intellectual property wants from the new prime minister
20 July 2026
Trademarks
New entrants and market shifts: WIPR unveils UK Trademark Rankings 2026
17 July 2026
Trade secrets
5 things to know about Apple’s trade secrets suit against OpenAI
13 July 2026

More articles

Nvidia faces shareholder suit over AI training and ‘fraudulent scheme’
Exclusive: Winston Taylor’s UK head of IP on pitching $1.75bn firm’s ‘humble, but lethal’ practice
Jury says Peloton owes $20.5m over third-party streaming tech
Arnold & Porter adds firepower to ITC practice with new partner hire
Music rightsholders win key victory against Suno AI in Germany
USPTO appoints new acting commissioner for patents
How four Southeast Asian countries are vying for investment via their IP courts
Judge slices $1.75m off Impossible Foods' damages, citing jury prejudice

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin