• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • INTA 2024
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • AI and rights: latest guidance from the US Copyright Office
shutterstock_1419091856_dcstockphotography
20 July 2023FeaturesCopyrightMark Doerr and Alexis Marin

AI and rights: latest guidance from the US Copyright Office

On June 28, 2023, the United States Copyright Office held a webinar to provide additional guidance to copyright applicants who have created works with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI). In short, the office has directed that applicants must disclose that a portion of the work was created with the assistance of AI, if the AI contribution was more than merely a de minimis amount. In other words, any “appreciable” contribution made by AI must be disclosed to the office in connection with an application.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
UK’s Lords urge IP Minister to tackle AI regulation
31 July 2023   House of Lords asks Viscount Camrose for an update on “important discussions” during debate over risks of the technology | Members propose creation of an AI department in the style of ARIA | Risks to copyrights, actors, and issue of AI inventorship raised.
Copyright
Reaction: UK scraps radical AI mining proposals
6 February 2023   Lawyers say the country is now behind the EU and Japan | Government may have pushed key AI questions to the courts | Finnegan | Marks & Clerk | Bird & Bird | Brown, Neri, Smith & Khan | Gowling WLG.
Copyright
Artistic licence?: Stability AI v Getty Images
26 January 2023   In the first of a two-part series on art and AI, Muireann Bolger explores a case that opens a Pandora's box of issues over the use of unlicensed creative works.


Editor's picks

Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025   Recent decision by acting USPTO director Coke Morgan Stewart has “damaging” consequences, argues Vidal | Stewart kickstarts campaign of implied criticism of predecessor’s record.
AI
UK delays AI bill at pivotal moment as High Court hears Getty case
9 June 2025
Artificial Intelligence
Getty v Stability AI: High stakes at the High Court
6 June 2025
Trademarks
AI, lipstick deals and mental health: What’s on CITMA president’s radar?
9 May 2025
Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025
Patents
US-China tariffs: What hope is there for IP rightsholders?
1 May 2025

More articles

‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
PierFerd taps experts in trade secrets and USPTO proceedings
Getty v Stability AI trial stalls over disturbing images issue
‘Any copying was done by Getty lawyers’: Stability AI hits back
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
BSH v Electrolux: A US perspective on cross-border patent enforcement
Davis Wright Tremaine adds founding duo from Knobbe Martens
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Copyright © worldipreview.com 2024   |   Headless Content Management with Blaze