• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Aereo case reaches Supreme Court
22 April 2014Copyright

Aereo case reaches Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a dispute that will decide whether TV streaming service Aereo infringes copyright.

Arguments in the case, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc, will begin this morning, April 22, at the court in Washington, DC.

Aereo captures TV broadcasts and retransmits them over the internet, allowing subscribers to watch and record live programmes.

Its subscribers pay between $8 and $12 a month for the service but Aereo does not pay licensing fees to the original broadcasters.

Several US broadcasters, including ABC and Fox, have claimed the service infringes their copyright.

The court agreed to hear the case in January this year when the broadcasters filed a petition for writ of certiorari following a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that backed Aereo and rejected calls for a preliminary injunction against it.

In their writ, the broadcasters have asked the Supreme Court to consider one question: “Whether a company ‘publicly performs’ a copyrighted television program when it retransmits a broadcast of that program to thousands of paid subscribers over the internet”.

However, in a pre-trial brief submitted last month, Aereo denied its performances were public and that therefore they do not infringe copyright.

“Although a ‘performance’ occurs when a consumer uses Aereo’s technology, that performance is ‘private’ and therefore lawful,” Aereo said, claiming the broadcasters’ arguments had “no merit”.

Last month, the US government threw its hat into the ring when it filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court, claiming the Aereo model “clearly infringes” copyright.

A final decision is not expected until June.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Aereo case argued in Supreme Court
23 April 2014   The US Supreme Court has heard oral arguments in a long-awaited case that will decide whether a TV streaming service infringes copyright.


Editor's picks

What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
19 December 2025

Editor's picks

AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
19 December 2025
Trademarks
X strikes back against Twitter.new
17 December 2025
Trade secrets
Aon sues new US rival for ‘poaching employees and taking boxloads of secrets’
17 December 2025
Trademarks
Rings of power: Oura counsel on protecting an $11bn brand
15 December 2025
Trademarks
Five firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s USA Trademarks Rankings
12 December 2025
Patents
5 ways director Squires is changing US innovation
10 December 2025

More articles

What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
Streaming setback: Nokia loses bid to shut down UK SEP dispute
Hogan Lovells and Cadwalader strike historic deal to create $3.6bn firm
Quantum innovation accelerating but funding gaps stall commercial shift
X strikes back against Twitter.new
Aon sues new US rival for ‘poaching employees and taking boxloads of secrets’
The IP in Netflix’s $87bn takeover bid for Warner Bros
AI consultation: UK’s creative industry votes overwhelmingly for one option

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin