• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Advertising networks seek to cut off revenue for piracy sites
16 July 2013Copyright

Advertising networks seek to cut off revenue for piracy sites

US companies which connect advertisers with websites have agreed to new measures which could lead to sites that infringe on intellectual property rights having advertising blocked.

The new measures, announced on July 15, which have been backed by networks including Google, AOL and Yahoo, will attempt to target sites that host pirated media or promote the sale of counterfeited goods.

Under the guidelines, rights holders can submit complaints about suspected copyright and trademark infringement to the companies, who could then demand the website stops infringement.

If the websites fail to comply the advertising networks could opt to stop supplying advertising.

According to Victoria Espinel, US IP enforcement coordinator, the new guidelines will see rights holders and advertising networks work together to reduce “financial incentives associated with infringement.”

In a statement on the White House’s official website, she says the move is a “positive step” towards reducing online piracy and counterfeiting.

“We encourage the companies participating to continue to work with all interested stakeholders, including creators, rights holders, and public interest groups, to ensure that their practices are transparent and fully consistent with the democratic values that have helped the Internet to flourish,” she said.

The news was met with a mixed response by copyright industry groups including the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)

Chris Dodd, chair of MPAA, said in a statement: “We applaud the interest and leadership in helping to protect the intellectual property rights of innovators and creators and its recognition that legitimate advertising should not be supporting illegal activity online.”

“However, an incremental step forward that addresses only a narrow subset of the problem and places a disproportionate amount of the burden on rights holders is not sufficient,” he added.

Jonathan Taplin, director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg Innovation Lab, welcomed the measures but also warned that they were “just a start.”

He said: “It [the agreement] will reduce the money flowing into the coffers of pirate sites, though they will find replacement ads, at a lower price.”

In a blog post Google said it is “pleased” to be participating in the agreement, adding: “by working across the industry, these best practices should help reduce the financial incentives for pirate sites by cutting off their revenue supply while maintaining a healthy Internet and promoting innovation.”

Other companies that have agreed to the measures include Microsoft, 24/7 Media, Adtegrity, Condé Nast and SpotXchange.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
10 June 2025

More articles

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin