• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Advertising networks seek to cut off revenue for piracy sites
16 July 2013Copyright

Advertising networks seek to cut off revenue for piracy sites

US companies which connect advertisers with websites have agreed to new measures which could lead to sites that infringe on intellectual property rights having advertising blocked.

The new measures, announced on July 15, which have been backed by networks including Google, AOL and Yahoo, will attempt to target sites that host pirated media or promote the sale of counterfeited goods.

Under the guidelines, rights holders can submit complaints about suspected copyright and trademark infringement to the companies, who could then demand the website stops infringement.

If the websites fail to comply the advertising networks could opt to stop supplying advertising.

According to Victoria Espinel, US IP enforcement coordinator, the new guidelines will see rights holders and advertising networks work together to reduce “financial incentives associated with infringement.”

In a statement on the White House’s official website, she says the move is a “positive step” towards reducing online piracy and counterfeiting.

“We encourage the companies participating to continue to work with all interested stakeholders, including creators, rights holders, and public interest groups, to ensure that their practices are transparent and fully consistent with the democratic values that have helped the Internet to flourish,” she said.

The news was met with a mixed response by copyright industry groups including the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)

Chris Dodd, chair of MPAA, said in a statement: “We applaud the interest and leadership in helping to protect the intellectual property rights of innovators and creators and its recognition that legitimate advertising should not be supporting illegal activity online.”

“However, an incremental step forward that addresses only a narrow subset of the problem and places a disproportionate amount of the burden on rights holders is not sufficient,” he added.

Jonathan Taplin, director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg Innovation Lab, welcomed the measures but also warned that they were “just a start.”

He said: “It [the agreement] will reduce the money flowing into the coffers of pirate sites, though they will find replacement ads, at a lower price.”

In a blog post Google said it is “pleased” to be participating in the agreement, adding: “by working across the industry, these best practices should help reduce the financial incentives for pirate sites by cutting off their revenue supply while maintaining a healthy Internet and promoting innovation.”

Other companies that have agreed to the measures include Microsoft, 24/7 Media, Adtegrity, Condé Nast and SpotXchange.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

Who are the world’s best in-house counsel? Final call for the leading corporate IP professionals
In-House
Who are the world’s best in-house counsel? Final call for the leading corporate IP professionals
7 January 2026

Editor's picks

In-House
Who are the world’s best in-house counsel? Final call for the leading corporate IP professionals
7 January 2026
Patents
PTAB year in review: A shifting landscape and outlook for 2026
2 January 2026
Patents
UPC: A review of 2025 and what to expect in 2026
30 December 2025
In-House
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
24 December 2025
AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
22 December 2025
Patents
Streaming setback: Nokia loses bid to shut down UK SEP dispute
19 December 2025

More articles

Nokia ends global dispute with major consumer electronics company
How AI will be shaped by legal and regulatory developments in 2026
Who are the world’s best in-house counsel? Final call for the leading corporate IP professionals
Merchant & Gould hires 13 attorneys to open new Boston office
Why the US is poised for a patent litigation surge in 2026
Top Gun: Maverick suit nosedives on copyright and contract claims
Betty Boop and early Disney characters enter US public domain
Trademark and brands expert returns to Womble Bond after spell in-house

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin