Brandon Bourdages / Shutterstock.com
The US Supreme Court ruled on three IP cases in June, clarifying the rules on issues such as attorneys’ fees in copyright cases and claim construction in patent disputes. WIPR analyses what the decisions might mean in practice.
Halo v Pulse/Stryker v Zimmer
The first in a series of decisions by the US Supreme Court was the Halo v Pulse and Stryker v Zimmer combined cases.
The decision was announced on June 13 and the court decided to relax the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s test for awarding enhanced damages in patent cases.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
US Supreme Court, Halo v Pulse/Stryker v Zimmer, Kirtsaeng v John Wiley, Cuozzo Speed Technologies v Lee, patent, trademark, copyright, IPR, PTAB,
