For the first time, the Federal Court has granted an order by which a Canadian trademark registration was quashed and the matter was sent back to the Registrar of Trade-marks to consider a Statement of Opposition.
The statement had been filed with the registrar prior to the expiry of the advertisement period, but had not been considered by it (London Life Insurance Company v Registrar of Trademarks and Debt Freedom Canada Inc).
In Canada, the Registrar of Trade-marks has a legal duty to consider a Statement of Opposition filed against an advertised application. This duty consists of either allowing an opposition to proceed where the statement raises a substantial issue for decision, or rejecting the opposition where it does not.
In this case, a Statement of Opposition had been filed against an advertised trademark application, but despite the registrar not having rejected the opposition, the mark proceeded to registration. Upon learning of the registration of the mark, the potential opponent commenced an application for judicial review in respect of the registrar’s (i) inadvertent failure to exercise its duty to act fairly; and (ii) actions outside its jurisdiction.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
Statement of Opposition, finance, Canada Trade-marks Act