Pryimak Anastasiia / Shutterstock.com
The blockbuster’s copyright setback has positive implications for dance choreographers, whose ‘emotes’ have become part of videogame lore, finds Marisa Woutersen.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has reversed a district court's decision to dismiss a copyright infringement case revolving around allegations of copyright infringement of choreography.
The case, Kyle Hanagami v Epic Games, concerns the dance moves featured in their widely played game Fortnite, and questions whether the choreography used in the game is eligible for copyright protection.
Hanagami contended that Epic Games had infringed the copyright of his choreographic work by creating and selling a virtual animation, referred to as an emote, which incorporated elements of his registered choreography.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
US Court of Appeals, copyright, Fortnite, Kyle Hanagami v. Epic Games, Epic Games, Dorsey & Whitney, Saul Ewing, US, third-person shooter, emotes