Enlarged Board of Appeal tackles entitlement to priority
It is certainly an exciting time at the EPO—barely two months have passed since the long awaited “plausibility” decision ( G 2/21), and the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) has just held oral proceedings to help it decide on another highly anticipated referral—this time on legal entitlement to priority ( G 1/22 and G 2/22).
The EBA has been asked two questions, which can be summarised as follows:
1: Is the EPO competent to assess whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title?
2: Is the priority claim for a European application valid where a priority application is filed by A and the priority claiming PCT application names A as an applicant for the US only but B as an applicant for all other states (including Europe)?
No decision was announced during the oral proceedings, which lasted less than three hours, but the positions of the parties after the hearing can be summarised as follows:
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk