rafapress / Shutterstock.com
Whether by design or decree, rebranding a business is beset with challenges, finds Tom Phillips.
When Muzmatch, a dating app for Muslims, lost the right to use its name in April 2022, its founder and CEO called it “heartbreaking.”
Shahzad Younas, who in 11 years built up a six million-strong membership, became a target of legal action by Match Group and a casualty of an ultra-competitive industry.
In its case heard before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC), Match Group, which owns a portfolio of dating apps, including Tinder, complained that consumers would mistakenly assume Muzmatch was a “sub-brand” specifically targeted at Muslim users because of its use of “match” in its name.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
Rebranding, design, Muzmatch, IPEC, trademark opposition, investment, SMEs, startups, IP rights