marog - pixcells / Shutterstock.com
If 3D printing begins to make real inroads into traditional product markets, then IP owners and law makers will need to work out how to address the potential pitfalls, says Matt Hervey of Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co.
3D printers are becoming increasingly popular. Once affordable only to large manufacturers (BMW was an early adopter) or to specialist prototyping bureaus, 3D printers are now commonly owned by product designers, architects and schools. A new generation of (relatively) reliable and slickly designed printers is targeting the home enthusiast.
This popularity has fuelled intellectual property concerns. The nightmare scenario for IP owners is that their products go the way of music and video: rampant online sharing of files for the creation of copies of their products that are printed at home. As if to confirm this, The Pirate Bay, the notorious online collection of pirated music and videos, introduced a ‘physibles’ category for 3D printing files. Gartner, the information technology research and advisory firm, has predicted “intellectual property theft worth at least $16 billion in 2016 due to 3D printing”. As explored below, such concerns may, for now, be overstated.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
Matt Hervey, Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co, 3D printing, IP, counterfeits, technology, 3D printing,