2020-03-30
30 March 2020PatentsSarah Morgan

Germany wants UPC project to go ahead, despite ruling

The German government is pushing for the Unified Patent Court (UPC) project to go ahead, just one week after the country’s Federal Constitutional Court concluded that the Act of Approval for the UPC Agreement was null and void.

In a  press release issued on Thursday, March 26, Germany’s minister of justice and consumer protection Christine Lambrecht said: “I will continue to work to ensure that we can provide the European innovative industry with a single European patent with a European patent court.”

On March 20, the German Federal Constitutional Court  upheld the constitutional complaint filed against the country’s UPC legislation by Düsseldorf-based attorney Ingve Stjerna in 2017.

The Act of Approval was found to be void, as it was passed with an insufficient quorum in the German parliament. According to the court, a two-thirds majority was required to pass the act.

Lambrecht added that the government would “carefully evaluate” the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court and “examine possibilities to remedy the lack of form found during this legislative period”.

Technically, the German parliament could rectify the situation by voting on the act again and obtaining a two-thirds majority.

However, the UPC Agreement will need to be amended because of the UK government’s  decision to withdraw from the project in February, which pushes the decision further down the line.

The COVID-19 pandemic is also likely to cause significant delays—both in terms of amending the agreement and in terms of arranging a new vote.

In an  analysis of the court’s decision, published by WIPR last week, Tilman Müller-Stoy, partner at Bardehle Pagenberg in Germany, said that if the UPC Agreement is revised the opportunity should be seized to make the system more attractive.

He concludes: “There are still many aspects that need to be considered and clarified before a version of the UPC Agreement exists which can be considered for ratification. This will take time, if there is even sufficient political will. The COVID-19 crisis is another delaying factor. Yet, that does not change anything about the fact that most of industry is rightly in favour of the system even without the UK, and time for improvements isn’t a bad thing, is it?”

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.

Today’s top stories:

Supermac’s prevails over London cocktail bar in TM dispute

UKIPO introduces ‘interrupted days’ to tackle COVID-19 disruption

EU court blocks TM protection for twisted cheese stick

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
16 April 2020   Is the German constitutional court decision to declare the German ratification law on the UPC agreement null and void just a formality, or is there more to adapt in the UPC system? Tilman Müller-Stoy of Bardehle Pagenberg explores the possible outcomes for the court in Germany and beyond.
Patents
20 March 2020   The German Federal Constitutional Court has upheld the constitutional complaint filed against the country’s Unified Patent Court legislation, less than one month after the UK said it would not be seeking involvement in the system.
Patents
20 March 2020   Earlier today, the German Federal Constitutional Court concluded that the country’s Act of Approval to the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court is void, seemingly ringing the death knell for the system. But could this decision be a boon for UK patent litigation? WIPR investigates.