14 August 2015Patents

Federal Circuit reinstates $45m Akamai v Limelight ruling

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has reinstated the $45.5 million damages award in the Akamai v Limelight dispute after it ruled en banc that Limelight is liable for direct infringement.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

US court says Limelight did not infringe Akamai patent

14 May 2015 An appeals court has upheld a US Supreme Court ruling in the Akamai v Limelight case stating that Limelight is not liable for patent infringement because multiple parties had performed different steps of the infringement.

Patents

Damages in Akamai v Limelight agreed at $51m

6 July 2016 A US court has entered its final judgment in a long-running patent infringement dispute between Limelight Networks and Akamai Technologies with the final damages total standing $12 million below the agreed maximum threshold.

DexCom suffers second patent revocation at hands of UPC

Q&A: Counsel on leading Paltalk’s $65.7m win against Cisco

Plastic evolution: how Lego is using IP to build a more sustainable brand

INTA sounds warning to SCOTUS over corporate liability case

‘You need a lot of time’: Bardehle Pagenberg's Tilman Müller on the UPC

How an Academy Award-winning makeup pro helped win rare $30.5m beauty trial

The Tunisian women leveraging IP to protect their art and heritage

EU Commission report: ‘All member states’ should join UPC

Federal Circuit reinstates $45m Akamai v Limelight ruling

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles