shutterstock_1014176104_willy_barton
8 September 2020PatentsRory O'Neill

UKIPO publishes wide-ranging AI and IP consultation

The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) is seeking views on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on all areas of the IP system.

The consultation, announced yesterday, September 7, calls for interested parties to offer their “ideas, expertise, and insight” on key questions involving the relationship between AI and IP.

As part of the consultation, the IPO published separate documents outlining questions about how AI intersects with patents, trademarks, copyright, designs, and trade secrets.

The main theme of the patents consultation is whether AI can be considered an “inventor”. At present, no jurisdiction has recognised AI as an inventor. The IPO has rejected a patent application listing AI application Dabus as an inventor, as have the European Patent Office (EPO) and the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Other areas of the patents document examine issues including the inventive step required for an invention to be patentable.

Specifically, the IPO asked whether AI challenges the “level of inventive step required to obtain a patent”, and whether it should introduce the concept of a “machine of ordinary skill in the art”.

Elsewhere, the IPO is also seeking views on the impact of AI on trademark law, including the concept of the “average consumer” and whether AI can be an infringer.

The IPO asked whether current trademark law can be successfully applied to AI technology, or whether it must be adapted.

The consultation poses a total of 45 questions across each of the five sections, and members of the public will have until November 30 to respond.

The IPO said one of the goals of the consultation was to ensure that the UK remains “at the forefront of the AI and data revolution”.

An IPO report published last June revealed that US inventors file more AI patents in the UK than British inventors.

The report said the figure was “likely a reflection of the fact that many of the leading applicants are US-based technology companies, but it is still striking”.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.

Today’s top stories

Nike triumphs over Puma in ‘Footware’ TM dispute

Africa’s first IP cooperation project approves GI registration

CJEU rules on Irish royalties row

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
24 August 2020   IP decisions made about Dabus—a “creativity machine”—are likely to accelerate legislative consideration of the patentability of inventions by AI. For now, those using AI in innovation should consider what kind of human involvement suffices for a patent, and consider alternative forms of protection, says Matt Hervey, head of artificial intelligence at Gowling WLG.
Patents
18 June 2019   There are more US-based applicants filing for artificial intelligence-related patents in the UK than UK-based applicants, according to a report from the UK Intellectual Property.
Copyright
7 October 2020   The UK Intellectual Property Office is reviewing the legal framework for IP enforcement and has called for views on two particular areas: the cost of legal challenges, and the accessibility and effectiveness of the judicial process.