13 October 2020PatentsSarah Morgan

SCOTUS agrees to hear Arthrex

The US Supreme Court has granted certiorari in three cases concerning constitutional challenges to the appointment of administrative patent judges.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

BREAKING: SCOTUS says IPRs should be reviewable in Arthrex; hands more power to USPTO director

21 June 2021 The US Supreme Court has confirmed that judges for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) act as unconstitutional principal officers, and should therefore have been appointed by the President, in its final ruling in United States v Arthrex.

Trademarks

SCOTUS denies writ claiming Arthrex applies to TTAB

18 May 2021 The US Supreme Court has denied a trademark applicant's appeal in an ongoing dispute with Coca-Cola that claimed the ruling in Arthrex also calls into question the constitutionality of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).

Patents

Apple and Intel weigh in on SCOTUS Arthrex review

4 December 2020 Apple and Intel, along with tech and IP groups, are urging the US Supreme Court to retain an administrative process for challenging patents.

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies

SEPs now searchable on WIPO’s global patent database

INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting

'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system

Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates

WATCH: Finding a new balance in IP protection with trade secret protection

Optis v Apple: How the court calculated the royalty rate

Cahill expands practice with three-partner team from King & Spalding

SCOTUS agrees to hear Arthrex

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles