1 April 2020TrademarksRory O'Neill

Ninth Circuit axes Jack Daniel’s TM win on First Amendment grounds

A dog toy based on the design of a bottle of Jack Daniel’s whiskey could be protected from trademark infringement claims on the grounds of free expression, a US federal court has ruled.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

SCOTUS takes up Jack Daniel’s parody clash

23 November 2022 Justices to chew over ‘Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker’ dog toy | Free expression and parody at issue | TM owners facing “mass confusion” claims the whiskey maker.

Trademarks

‘Bad Spaniels’ dog toy maker pushes against Jack Daniel’s SCOTUS bid

19 October 2022 Parody dog chew at the centre of decision against the whiskey maker | Amicus curie from at least six brands and TM groups, including Campbell Soup, Levis, and INTA.

Trademarks

Fed Circ overturns TTAB in colour trade dress ruling

9 April 2020 In a precedential ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overturned a decision on the protection of colour under trademark law.

‘Once is good enough’: Getty closing arguments rely on scant evidence

Ferrari wins Testarossa classic car case at EU court

‘Here to stay’: UKIPO unveils ‘interesting’ SkyKick roadmap

Champagne makers raise glass to key EU ruling on PDOs

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman

Life after Iconix v Dream Pairs: Key lessons for brand owners

Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

Dream Pairs 2—Iconix 1: A CoA rebuke

Ninth Circuit axes Jack Daniel’s TM win on First Amendment grounds

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles