• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Community & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Trademarks
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Influential Women in IP 2026
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Mexican filmmakers cleared in image rights scandal
shutterstock-63339079-web
12 February 2014Copyright

Mexican filmmakers cleared in image rights scandal

A pair of Mexican filmmakers who made a documentary about a high profile murder case have been spared a multi-million-dollar fine over an image rights dispute.

The film’s director and producer, Layda Negrete and Roberto Hernandez, were accused of using an image of a murdered man without the permission of his family, and one of a witness in the case without his authorisation.

However, they were cleared of wrong-doing and spared a $225 million dollar fine.

The lawsuit was filed by relatives of Juan Carlos Reyes who was murdered in 2005 in Mexico City and on whose murder the film is based.

The film, Presumed Guilty, premiered in 2011 and told the story of how an innocent man, Toño Zúñiga, was convicted for the murder.

However, the victim’s family said they suffered "moral damage" because the film showed Reyes' dead body despite the documentary makers not having permission.

Furthermore, Victor Daniel Reyes Bravo, a cousin of the victim and the eyewitness on whose testimony the case was based, also sought damages from the pair.

Reyes Bravo, who admits on screen that he never saw the person who shot his cousin, did not dispute the accuracy of the film but claimed he never gave the filmmakers permission to include his image.

The film played a crucial role in getting a re-trial which reversed Zúñiga’s sentence; despite the fact it was banned shortly after its release pending the conclusion of the lawsuits.

On January 31, Mexico City Civil Court Judge Norma Alejandra Muñoz ruled in favour of the filmmakers.

“The key rule that we can bring from this case is that image rights will have a special effect concerning documentaries or audio visual news productions where the end result is used to provide news,” said Luis Schmidt, attorney at Olivares & Cia In Mexico City, who represented the documentary makers.

“Firstly, the judge ruled that the complainants had not objectively proved that the situation affected them and secondly there was not a need for authorisation where someone is documenting fact for journalism and news reports.”

Schmidt added: “This was considered to be journalistic piece of work and an investigation and is great news for future broadcasts.”

The plaintiffs have been given 12 days in which to appeal.

Negrete and Hernandez still face another civil suit brought by the police officer who arrested Zuñiga and who is also featured in the documentary.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

Rankings Research
Top law firms and individuals recognised in WIPR’s UK Patents Rankings 2026
14 August 2026

Editor's picks

Rankings Research
Top law firms and individuals recognised in WIPR’s UK Patents Rankings 2026
14 August 2026
Copyright
No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
30 July 2026
Trademarks
Bottega Veneta vs Meta: ‘Made in Italy’ row tests limits of online enforcement
29 July 2026
AI
Are you listening, Prime Minister?
24 July 2026
Patents
Second UPC injunction piles pressure on Disney
24 July 2026
Patents
What UK intellectual property wants from the new prime minister
20 July 2026

More articles

Hollywood studios group signs AI deal with ByteDance
Shein loses Temu copyright fight and faces costly lesson in platform liability
ArentFox Schiff hires ‘powerhouse’ team at new Silicon Valley office
Nvidia faces shareholder suit over AI training and ‘fraudulent scheme’
Music rightsholders win key victory against Suno AI in Germany
No ‘piggy-backing’: Hasbro wins sweeping order in Peppa case
OpenAI gains upper hand in India’s first major AI copyright dispute
A pig in wolf’s clothing: Peppa brings home copyright success

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin