Internet Archive ‘emergency library’ sparks outrage from authors
Last week, the digital library Internet Archive launched its ‘national emergency library’, expanding access to 1.4 million digitised works, to meet the “unprecedented global and immediate need for access to reading and research materials” during the COVID-19 pandemic.
But the launch has drawn scathing criticism from authors, and author and publishers associations, who have accused Internet Archive of making an “opportunistic attack” on the rights of authors and publishers in the midst of the outbreak.
Over the weekend, authors including Neil Gaiman and Colson Whitehead condemned the move, which now allows Internet Archive to lend books to anyone at the same time, instead of a one-in, one-out ebook borrowing system.
In a tweet, Pulitzer-winner Whitehead claimed: “They scan books illegally and put them online. It's not a library.”
The Authors Guild in the US said that it was shocked that the service would “use the COVID-19 epidemic as an excuse to push copyright law further out to the edges, and in doing so, harm authors, many of whom are already struggling”.
Amid the pandemic, authors across the world are having to cancel book tours and speaking engagements, and are losing out on freelance work. Full-time authors, according to the Authors Guild, had mean writing incomes of only $20,300 a year prior to the crisis.
“Acting as a piracy site—of which there already are too many—the Internet Archive tramples on authors’ rights by giving away their books to the world,” said the Authors Guild, adding that the guild and authors sent hundreds of takedown notices to Internet Archive last year.
The Authors Guild sentiments were echoed by the Association of American Publishers, which claimed: “It is the height of hypocrisy that the Internet Archive is choosing this moment – when lives, livelihoods and the economy are all in jeopardy – to make a cynical play to undermine copyright, and all the scientific, creative, and economic opportunity that it supports.”
Similarly, the UK’s Society of Authors claimed that the move was “disgraceful”. Nicola Solomon, chief executive of the society, added: “Internet Archive has no legal right to give away authors’ in-copyright work free of charge. It is piracy—pure and simple—and it must be stopped.”
However, Internet Archive has now fired back, publishing a lengthy response to the piracy accusations and claiming that both associations’ statements contain falsehoods.
It argued that the books have not been acquired illegally and, just like a traditional library, have been acquired through purchase or donation.
“Libraries buy books or get them from donations and lend them out. This has been true and legal for centuries. The idea that this is stealing fundamentally misunderstands the role of libraries in the information ecosystem,” said the response.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.
Today’s top stories:
‘I Survived Corona’: The TM filings cashing in on a pandemic
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk