25 June 2019Trademarks

Iancu v Brunetti: A marker in the moral policing of IP, say lawyers

Lawyers have welcomed the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the ban on scandalous and disparaging marks, after the court found yesterday, June 24, that it violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Iancu resigns, calls for end to ‘state-sponsored theft’

20 January 2021 US Patent and Trademark Office director Andrei Iancu confirmed his resignation with a rallying call for an end to state-sponsored theft and reform of patent eligibility.

Trademarks

‘Redskins’ name scrapped, but replacement in TM limbo: reports

13 July 2020 The Washington Redskins are dropping the highly contentious name, but its replacement is tied up in a “trademark battle”, it has been reported.

Trademarks

Reclaiming language: are IP offices behind the times?

3 June 2020 Last year the UK Intellectual Property Office ran into the same problem that its US counterpart faced three years ago: what happens when the meaning of traditionally offensive or abusive terms changes, and how should IP offices react? Rory O’Neill reports.

Tesla ‘Robotaxi’ and ‘Cybercab’ TMs rebuffed by USPTO on eve of launch

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies

AI, lipstick deals and mental health: What’s on CITMA president’s radar?

INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting

Iconix, dupe culture and the risk of post-sale confusion

'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system

Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates

Cahill expands practice with three-partner team from King & Spalding

Iancu v Brunetti: A marker in the moral policing of IP, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles