istock-471440374_anthonyrosenberg
2 August 2018Patents

Dyson drops design patent dispute with SharkNinja

Vacuum maker Dyson dismissed an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit earlier this week, bringing a four-year design patent battle with competitor SharkNinja to an end.

Back in February 2014, Dyson claimed at the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois that SharkNinja was infringing three design patents (US numbers D577,163; D668,010; and D668,823) through the sale of stick vacuums (Shark Rockets).

“Over the next four-plus years, the parties battled over non-infringement, claim construction, invalidity, and inventorship issues through more than 500 docket entries and three rounds of expert discovery,” said Jones Day, the law firm that represented SharkNinja in the dispute.

In March this year, Judge Robert Dow granted SharkNinja’s third motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the three patents.

Shark had argued that its designs were “plainly dissimilar” from Dyson’s asserted patents, a contention that Dow agreed with.

“Overall, the Shark Rockets have streamlined shapes with flowing contours that create an aerodynamic look … By contrast, the Dyson design uses regular geometric shapes—like rectangles, circles, and tubes—and perpendicular lines that create a more industrial, machine-like look with distinct component parts,” said Dow.

The following month, Dyson filed a notice of appeal against the decision to the Federal Circuit, but on Monday, July 30, Dyson submitted its motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal.

Yesterday, August 1, the Federal Circuit granted the motion to dismiss, ordering each party to bear their own costs.

This isn’t the only clash between the competitors—in June, WIPR  reported that a jury had awarded Dyson $16.4 million in damages in a false advertising case against SharkNinja.

After a ten-day trial, the jury found that SharkNinja had falsely advertised its product as better than Dyson’s vacuum, which Dyson had claimed was its best-performing product on the market.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Today's top stories

Steve McQueen’s son tries to put brakes on Ferrari promotions

Beyoncé cracks down on fake merchandise amid tour with Jay-Z

New York man arrested for stealing GE trade secrets

Marks & Clerk boosts London office

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
14 June 2018   A jury at the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division has awarded vacuum maker Dyson $16.4 million in damages in a four-year dispute over false advertising.
Trademarks
9 January 2019   Thirty six people who mass-produced counterfeit products of British brand Dyson have been arrested by police in Shanghai, China.
Patents
8 June 2023   Shark FlexStyle legal action part of global litigation waged between the pair over the patented tech | SharkNinja claims differences in design and product features.