robert-kneschke-shutterstock-com-piracy-
2 August 2016

Delhi High Court says URL blocking too hard to police

The Delhi High Court has rejected a request to restrict blocking orders to individual URLs, ruling that it would be “cumbersome” and “time consuming”.

Justices Pradeep Nandrajog and A.K. Pathak passed the ruling, which drew a distinction between blocking individual URL links and entire domain names.

The judges said simply blocking URLs that fall under individual websites, and which were thought to be displaying infringing content, is not a sufficient solution because it can be too easily circumvented.

The order comes after India’s Department of Electronics and Information Technology filed for an order at the court.

The department called for an order that blocking orders handed to internet service providers are restricted to individual URLs where the infringing content was available and not the domain as a whole.

But the court rejected the request.

“Most of them [pirate websites] hide behind domain privacy services, making it extremely difficult, and almost impossible to locate the owners of these websites,” the judgment said.

The judgment added that by simply blocking a URL an infringer can start operating on another, slightly different, URL “within seconds”.

For example, the court said the website www.abc.com could contain the URL www.abc.com/india-v-pakistan.

Even if it that URL is blocked the website owner “can simply log into the website source code and insert the letter ‘s’ after the letter ‘v’ and change the URL to www.abc.com/india-vs-pakistan and start operating again.

But, said the court, if a domain name is blocked, then continuing with the infringing activity becomes “cumbersome”, “time consuming” and a “money spending exercise”.

This was first published on  Trademarks and Brands Online.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
19 July 2016   The UK’s Gambling Commission has introduced rules that ban gambling services from advertising on copyright infringing websites.
article
22 June 2016   The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has overturned an earlier lower court ruling and said that the safe harbour under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act does apply to pre-1972 recordings.
article
29 July 2016   Nu Dot Co, a subsidiary of US-based Straat Investments, and Vistaprint have successfully acquired the .web and .webs new generic top-level domains for $135 million and $1 million respectively.