shutterstock_1792435639_gaschwald
22 February 2021PatentsRory O'Neill

Daimler, Ferrari escape Formula One Halo suit

A Texas federal judge has shielded automobile makers from patent infringement claims, leaving the regulator and owners of Formula One to face the lawsuit.

Norwegian inventor Jens Nygaard sued Formula One as well as car manufacturers including Ferrari and Daimler, and decorated racing driver Lewis Hamilton.

The claims relate to the Halo safety device installed in Formula One racing cars, designed to protect drivers in the event of a crash.

Nygaard claims he engaged with Formula One for years to try and have his patented Halo design installed in racing cars—and when they eventually were, he was not compensated.

But since the suit was filed last year, the US District Court for the Western District of Texas has whittled down a lengthy list of defendants which included racing drivers and teams.

The court dismissed the suits against Hamilton and fellow F1 driver Charles Leclerc under the customer-suit exception, which protects end-product consumers from being sued for patent infringement.

The court has now invoked this same doctrine to dismiss claims against Ferrari, Mercedes owner Daimler, and the Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix team. The February 18 decision follows the dismissal of claims against Red Bull’s racing team earlier this month.

Mercedes and Daimler also informed the court on Friday, February 19 that it had filed a petition to cancel Nygaard’s Halo patent at the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB is expected to decide whether to institute inter partes review in August this year.

Patent infringement claims remain outstanding against Formula One’s management company, as well as its governing body, the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile.

Last August, Formula One was rebuffed in its efforts to block a trademark application which it claimed would cause confusion with the ‘F1’ brand.

The UK Intellectual Property Office ruled that sports brand owner Bux & Co’s ‘F1T’ trademark was unlikely to cause confusion in the market place.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Today’s top stories

Vodafone appeal loss clarifies govt use of IP

Ford CEO urges LG to settle with rival battery supplier

Burberry wins prelim injunction against Chinese ‘Baneberry’ brand

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
18 August 2020   In a blow for Formula One, the UK Intellectual Property Office has prevented the brand from blocking a trademark registration that it claimed would lead to confusion with its own ‘F1’ mark.
Patents
4 February 2021   Child car seat maker Wonderland is suing its US rival Evenflo, alleging that it infringed three patents that cover its products at the US District Court for the District of Delaware.
article
1 November 2021   The Court of Justice of the European Union has, for the first time, held that individual parts of a whole product which have been disclosed to the public may be protected as unregistered Community designs.